Writ petition challenging disengagement from APSRTC service and subsequent proceedings. No representation appeared for the petitioner on two occasions; the High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 17450 OF 2005
Between:
D.V. SUBBA REDDY, S/o. D.V. Malla Reddy R/o. Peddachettupally Post, Kothapet Village, Proddatur Mandal, CuddapahDistrict,
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiaprayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,theHighCourtmay be pleased to issue an order direction or writ particularlyoneinthenature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaringtheactionofthe respondents in deleting the name of the petitioneranddisengagingthe service of the petitioner vide office Order No. M1/2(17)/99-RJPT dt. 14-91999 of the Depot Manager, Rajampet as illegal andarbitrary; ii) declaring the proceeding No. SP(P)(52)/04-RM'C' dt. 28-4-2005issuedbythe1st Respondent-Region Manager, Kadapa is illegal, arbitraryandunjust;and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate thepetitionerintoservice with all attendant benefits.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2005(WPMP. NO: 22202 OF 2005i
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K UDAYA SRI
APHC010053092005
[3457]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 17450/2005
Between:
D.v. Subba Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
A P S R T C Cuddapah Region 2 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.KUDAYASRI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
There is no representation for the petitioner on 05.08.2024. Hence, the matter was listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
- Even today also there is no representation for the petitioner.
- Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.Noorder as to costs.
&
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if at
//TRUE COPY//
To
'Cf/?
HIGH COURT
MVS
DATED: 12/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.17450 of 2005
o
21 FEB 2C25
Current Section
DISMISSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COST
D.V. Subba Reddy
A P S R T C Cuddapah Region & 2 Others, Corporation, Cuddapah Region, Rep. by its Regional Manager
Divisional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Proddatur
The Depot Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Rajampet Depot
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
