Dismissed

Muchu Venkateswara Rao, v. The state of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC17 Nov 2024WP/9416/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Father filed a habeas corpus petition alleging his son was picked up and illegally detained by Challapalli police. The son was produced before the Court, stating he had escaped custody. With no appearance for the petitioner thereafter, the Court dismissed the writ petition for default, without costs.

What did the court decide?

None granted; writ petition dismissed for default, no costs.

Muchu Venkateswara Rao, Vs The state of Andhra Pradesh — Andhra Pradesh HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND

¶5

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 9416 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

Muchu Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Nageswara Rao, D.No. 8-219, Ramanagaram, Challapalli, Krishna District, A.P.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

The state of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by it's Principal Secretary, Department Of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur^District.

¶12

The Director General of police, DGP's office, Tadepalli, Guntur District, Guntur.

¶13

The Superintendent of Police, Machilipatnam, Krishna District, A.P.

¶14

The Deputy Superintendent of police, Machilipatnam, Krishna District, A.P.

¶15

Circle Inspector of Police, Challapalli, Krishna District, A.P.

¶16

The Station House Officer, Challapalli P.S. Chalapali

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may

¶19

¶20

be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondents to produce physically person i.e., Muchu Seetharamayya, S/o. Muchu Venkateswara Rao, Aged 38 years, D.No. 8-219, Ramanagaram, Challapalli, Krishna District, A.P before this Hon'ble^Court.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B. PARAMESEWARA RAO

¶22

Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

»■ APHC010170522024

¶24

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶25

[3508]

¶26

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶27

MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶28

PRESENT

¶29

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶30

WRIT PETITION NO: 9416/2024

¶31

Between;

¶32

Muchu Venkateswara Rao, ...PETITIONER

¶33

AND

¶34

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶35

...RESPONDENT{S)

¶36

1.B PARAMESEWARA RAO

¶37

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶38

1.THE ADVOCATE GENERAL (AP)

¶39

The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) This Writ Petition was moved by the petitioner contending^thathis son had been picked up by the 5'^ respondent and detained illegally, without any arrest being shown, on 11.02.2024.

¶40

The detenue was produced before this Court, on 13.08.2024.^The detenue contended that he was initially subjected to third degree methods, after being picked up on 09.02.2024 and that he had subsequently escaped

¶41

¶42

'•'IS

¶43

from police custody on the very same day and had stayed^{atvariousplaces,} till he was produced before this Court.

¶44

Since that day there is no appearance on behalf of^{thepetitioner.} is not 4. In the circumstances, it appears that the petitioner interested in prosecuting this Writ Petition and accordingly,^{thisWritPetitionis}

¶45

dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to^costs.

¶46

As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if^{anyshallstand}

¶47

closed.

¶48

//TRUE COPY//

¶49

Sd/- A. VENUGOPALA RAO ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR

¶50

To.

¶51

SE^TiOffo^FICER

¶52

OneCCto Sri B. Paramesewara Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

¶53

Two CCs to The Advocate General, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT]

¶54

Three C.D. Copies.

Cnr

i I

HIGH COURT

DATED:18/11/2024

ORDER

WP.No.9416 of 2024

AND/y^^
X 2 1 JAN 20?5 n
^ Current Section

¶62

DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS

Muchu Venkateswara Rao, v. The state of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muchu Venkateswara Rao, v. The state of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.S.K.v.Prasada Rao Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Malli Sai Enterprises Vs the Commercial Tax Officer

Malli Sai Enterprises Vs The Commercial Tax Officer (Int)

Gandikota Rajesh, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt.Ramisetty Lingamma, Vs Smt.Ramisetty Alivelu Manga Tayaru

V.Krishna Murthy, Vs Mr.B.Raja Sekhar