Writ appeal repeatedly adjourned at the appellant's request to change vakalat; no steps taken, indicating no serious intent to pursue the appeal. The writ appeal was dismissed for default with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
tir
r
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO^ AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAiyL
WRIT APPEAL NO: 366 OF 2019 ^
Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent filed against order dated 1303-2012 in W.P.No.2896 of 2012 on the file of the High Court._
Between:
Smt.Ramisetty Lingamma, W/o. Late Yedukondalu, Aged about 55 years, Occ House-wife, R/o.C/o.Sandhya Hotel, Jaggaiahpet Townand Mandal, Krishna District.
...APPELLANT^
AND
...RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151^CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dt. 13-03-2012 passed by Single Judge of this Hon’ble Court in WP.No.2896 of 2012 pending disposal of this writ appeal.
Counsel for the Appellant(s): SRI. NAGARAJU NAGURU _
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
APHC011463882013
[3508]
I
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT APPEAL NO: 366/2019
Between:
Smt.ramisetty Lingamma
...APPELLANT
AND
Smt Ramisetty Alivelu Manga Tayaru and Others Counsel for the Appellant:
...RESPONDENT(S)
1.NAGARAJU NAGURU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.KSARVA BHOUMA RAO
2.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following Judgment: (per Hon’bleSriJusticeR.RaghunandanRao) This matter has been adjourned six times at the requestofthe
learned counsel for the appellant to make arrangementsforchangingvakalat. Despite grant of time on so many occasions, no stepshavebeentaken.On 11.11.2024, this Court, observing these facts had postedthemattertodayfor dismissal.
- A mention is again made today for time to change vakalat. It is clear that there is no serious intent to pursue this Writ Appeal.
1
2
- Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall
be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any shall stand
closed.
Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU //TRUE COPY// DEPUTY REGISTRAR
SECTfON OFFICER
AL
/
HIGH COURT
V
<br>
DATED:18/11/2024
JUDGMENT
WA.No.366 of 2019
.70
m
g 2 9 NOV 202^
^ . Current Section
DISMISSING THE WA WITHOUT COSTS
Smt. Ramisetty Lingamma
Smt. Ramisetty Alivelu Manga Tayaru
The Thasildhar, Krishna District at Machilipatnam
District Collector, Krishna District at Machilipatnam
The State of AP, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department
The Sub-Registrar, Jaggaiahpeta, Krishna District
R Raghunandan Rao
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
