The Writ Petition filed by a student challenging the non-publication of examination results by the University was dismissed by the High Court as infructuous on the advice of counsel.
None. The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 911 OF 2018
Between:
B Lalith Kalyan,, S/o Chandra Sekhar, Aged about 20 years, Occ.Student, R/o 1-4/3-3, Post Office Lane, Kamakoti Nagar, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh.
/
...PETITIONER
AND
Health Sciences, Rep. by its Vice Chancellor, Ring Road, Vijayawada, Krishna District, Andhra Praedsh, Pin.520008.
Krishna District, Andhra Praedsh, Pin.520008.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the
w
'' nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not publishing the results of the Petitioner (Hall Ticket No. 15060026) without any reason as illegal, arbitrary and cannot stand to legal scrutiny and further direct the Respondents to publish the results of the Petitioner (Hall ticket No. 15060026) and if the Petitioner is declared passed, to allow the " Petitioner to pursue 2 nd year MBBS course and pass
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to publish the resultsofthePetitioner (Hall Ticket No. 15060026) and if the Petitioner is declared passed, to allow the Petitioner to pursue 2 nd year MBBS course pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. A BHASKARA CHARY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: GUTTAPALEM VIJAYAKUMAR (SC FOR Dr NTR HEALTH U)
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following ORDER:
APHC010011262018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3333]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 911/2018
Between:
B Lalith Kalyan,
...PETITIONER
AND
Vice Chancellor Dr Ntr Uni Of Health Sci and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.A BHASKARA CHARY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GUTTAPALEM VIJAYA KUMAR (SC FOR Dr NTR HEALTH U)
The Court made the following:
V
ORDER:
Mr. B.Bhaskara Chari, learned counsel for the petitioner(s)submits that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall
stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- P.VINOD KUA/IAR ASSISTANT.REGISTRAR SECTIOW Of14ceR
To,
PRK
HIGH COURT
DATED:15/03/2024
ORDER
WP.No.911 of 2018
anoh^
\ 1 7 FE3 2C?j I
^ . Current Section
DISMISSING OF THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
B Lalith Kalyan
Vice Chancellor, Dr.NTR Uni.of Health Sci
The Registrar, Dr.NTR University of Health Sciences
The P. E. S. Institute, of Medical Sciences and Reasearch
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
