This judgment dismisses Writ Petition No. 8388 of 2011 filed regarding seniority and pay fixation of contract teachers as the petitioner failed to appear for hearing on two prior occasions.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
%
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 8388 OF 2011
Between:
...Petitioners
AND
...Respondents
7r/
be pleased to issue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not finalizing the seniority list of Petitioners along with the other regular employees basing upon the date of initial appointments as contract teachers and not protecting the last drawn pay and increments as the same is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the respondents to finalize the seniority list of the petitioners basing upon their date of initial appointment and by protecting their past pay and increments attached to their posts and to fix them notionally by adding increments by taking their service with effect from their dated of initial a appointment ^ NO: 1 OF 2011 (WPMP. NO: 10418 OF 2011^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioners representation dt. 17-09-2009 for protecting their pay scales andincrementswhich were granted from their date of initial appointment pending disposal of writ petition.
I^A. NO: 1 OF 2012fWVMP. NO: 1389 OF 20121
Between:
... Petitioners/Respondents
AND
/
1
...Respondents/Petitioners
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the inter!rri oOrders dated 30.01.2012 passed in WPMP.No.10418/2011 in WP.No-8388/2011.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G RAVI MOHAN
'■••J
Counsel for the Respondente: SRI K DURGA PRASAD (SCFORAPRS SW)
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
The Court made the following Order:
i' 'J
APHC010015472011
SMB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3457]
MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 8388/2011
Between:
T. Samba Murthy, E.g.dist. & 15 Othrs
...PETITIONER
AND
The Govt Of A P S W Dept Hyd Ano ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.G RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent: 1. K DURGA PRASAD(SC FOR APRS SW) 2.GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE
The Court made the following Order:
Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner.Onearlier occasion also, there was no representation for the petitioner.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non
prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shall
stand closed,^
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- G HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
PAL qrl- section
\ \
HIGH COURT
DATED:11/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.8388 of 2011
fTof anoT?^ 5 17 APl^ ?C25 ^ Current Section ^
WITHOUT cost's^ '’' PROSECUTION
T. Samba Murthy and 14 Others
The Government of Andhra Pradesh (S.W. Dept.)
Andhra Pradesh Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutional Society
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
