The writ petition for reinstatement and subsistence allowance was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite listing under the caption for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY .THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT T
It
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.nV^ P/e,
WRIT PETITION NO: 14933 OF 2011 ^
Between:
rrfil Sharnshuddin Gazi, S/o.Khaja Moinuddin Technical Assistant <=^-1 Supplies
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated In the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue a Writ, order of direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents inI continuing the petitioner under prolonged suspension pursuant to the orders issued in Proceedings No.P:Admn.A3/4296/2006 dated 9-4-2009 by the 1st respondent as being arbitrary, illegal, unjust and contrary tothe instructions issued by the Government in G.O.Ms.No.526 dated 19-8-2008 and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits
I-A. NO: 2 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 17949 OF 2011)
Petition under Section 151 GPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay subsistence allowance to the petitioner along with arrears w.e.f:5-5-2009 to till date pending disposal of •the Writ Petition
■* S
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2011fWPMP. NO: 17948 OF 20111
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend ' Ihe operation of Proceedings No.P.Admn.A3/2654/2009 dated 9-4-2009 issued by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the main Wrif petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A PHANI BHUSHAN
Counsel for the Respondents: KALAMATA R BABUfSC AP CIVIL SUPPL CORPN)
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010020772011
Sp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3457] (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY. THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14933/2011
Between: Khaja Shamshuddin Gazi, Srikakulam
...PETITIONER
AND
The A P State Civil Supplies Corp Ltd 1 ...RESPONDENT(S) Another and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.APHANI BHUSHAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.KALAMATA R BABU(SC AP CIVIL SUPPL CORPN)
The Court made the following Order:
Despite the matter being listed under the caption for
dismissal,'today none represented for the petitioner.Onearlier
occasion also, there, was no representation for thepetitioner,
Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shall
i->r-/^ioTP A o
stand closed
Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY^EGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER /
To,
KR
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:11/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.14933 of 2011
X ? ) APR 2025
Co.
^ . Current bection
CLOSING OF THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Khaja Shamshuddin Gazi
A P State Civil Supplies Corp Ltd
Harinath N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
