Writ petition challenging a 2008 order of the Project Director, DWMA Kadapa concerning continuation as W.D.T. was dismissed for non-prosecution, no one appearing for the petitioner on multiple occasions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 11325 OF 2011
Between:
AA?n T Team (W.D.T.) (Agn.), Badwel, Kadapa District.
Development ...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the impugned Proc.Rc.No.C1/2935/DWMA/02,dated 20-8-2008 issued by the Project Director, D.W.M.A., Kadapa, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violative of principles of natural justice and also subversive of Articles 14, 16 and 311 of the Constitution and consequently hold that the petitioner is entitled to continue as W.D.T., in Kadapa district with all consequential benefits.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 201irWPMP. NO: 13884 OF 20111
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the impugned Proc. Rc.No.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI D. BALA KISHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010002972011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3457]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11325/2011
Between:
B. Chandra Sekhar, Kadapa Dist ...PETITIONER
AND
Project Director Kadapa Another and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.D BALAKISHAN RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV
The Court made the following Order:
Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner.On earlier
occasion also, there was no representation for the petitioner.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non
prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shall
stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-U. SRIDEVI ASSISTANT R^^IST^R SECTION OFFICER
To
Cnr
HIGH COURT
DATED:08/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.11325 of 2011
DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
B. Chandra Sekhar
Project Director, DWMA, Kadapa
District Collector & Chairman, D.W.M.A., Kadapa
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
