The High Court dismissed a Writ Petition transferred from Writ Petition APAT No. 83/2022 for default due to the petitioners' consistent failure to appear or file representation over multiple dates, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3459]
APHC010020452022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 83/2022
Between:
I Satyanarayana and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The Deputy Director and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.M NAGA RAJU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR SERVICES III
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
As there was no representation for the petitioners on 05.01.2023 and 03.03.2023, the matter was adjourned. On 14.10.2024 also, there was no representation for the petitioners, hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the case.
Therefore, this Writ Petition (AT) is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
Date: 17.10.2024
RSD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 83/2022
Date: 17.10.2024
RSD
Satyanarayana and Others
The Deputy Director and Others
Sumathi Jagadam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
