P Venkat Reddy v. D M Devraj
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY…
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE (AT) NO: 528 OF 202.^
Contempt Case under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, praying that the High Court may be pleased to summon the Respondents herein and punish them under section 17 of contempt of Courts Act read with sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act , for willfully and deliberately disobeyed the orders of this Hon'ble Tribunal passed in O.A. No. 9732 of 2012, dated 07-02-2014 as the same is confirmed by the Hon'ble High Court by the Judgment Dt. 28-11-2017 in WP No. 8816 of 2014.
Between:
...Applicant
AND
•*
-
Apartments, Edupugallu, Kankipadu Mandal, A.P., Vijayawada
521151.
« * 3. Sri Dr. Sambasiva Rao, IAS, Principal Secretary to State of Andhra
% %
• i V
Pradesh, Revenue (Registration and Stamps) Department, Secretariat »
Amaravati, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Arvind Kumar Kata Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Sri G Raju
Counsel for the Respondents No.1 & 3: None appeared
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010265632023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI 0^1 (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3459]
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE TRANSFERED FROM APAT NO: 528/2023
Between: P Venkat Reddy ...PETITIONER AND
D M Devraj and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.ARVIND KUMAR KATA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.G RAJU The Court made the following:
3
r
C.C.(AT).No.528 of 2023
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated 07.02.2014 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.9732 of 2012 has been complied with by the District Registrar, Registration and Stamps Ananthapuramu vide proceedings in Rc.No.E/1365/2015 dated 31.05.2019. He also submits that the petitioner was paid a difference of pension vide proceedings in P.P.O.No.13-020 126/SP dated 05.05.2016 and the Accountant General (A&E), Amaravathi, vide letter dated 05.08.2019 released the pension amount of the petitioner.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case (AT) is closed, giving liberty to the petitioner to take steps, if aggrieved. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SD/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR
To
//TRUE COPY//
SECHC^ OFFICER
Stu
vna
HIGH COURT
I DATED: 16/10/2024
^ ^
t
ORDER
CC(AT).No.528 of 2023
(? V
I 01 FEB 2025 S
Current Section
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE(AT) WITHOUT COSTS
P Venkat Reddy
D M Devraj
P. Venkat Rami Reddy
Dr. Sambasiva Rao
Sumathi Jagadam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court