This court disposed of a writ petition filed for appointment to a Class IV post. The court accepted the submission that the cause was no longer maintainable and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 7830 OF 2011
Between:
Sk. Meeraiah, S/o. Sk. Khadar, aged 49 year, R/o. Kallurpalli Village, Opp: MPP Elementary School, Nellore Rural Mandal, NelloreDistrict524004.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the letter No. IDC/MD/Adm./Legal/W.P.No.18343 of 2005/5674, dt. 20.2.2009 is illegal, arbitrary, unjust and contrary to government memo No. 1419/PElll(A1)/2008-1, dt. 31.12.2008 and set aside the same consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for appointmentto Class IV Post (Watchman/Attender) taking into consideration his past service and left over service in Ongole Division. ^
•r"'
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2011fWPMP. NO: 9735 OF 2011)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for Class IV Post for appointment either Watchman/Attender in Ongole Division.
Counsel for the PetitionenSRI VSR MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI S HARINATH REDDY(SCFORAP
IRRI DEV COR)
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI KARRI SATYA GOPINATH (SC
FOR APSIDC LTD)
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010152402011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH HMH AT AMARAVATI
[3457]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 7830/2011
Between:
Sk. Meeraiah ...PETITIONER
AND The Vice Chairman Managing Director and ...RESPONDENT(S) Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.V S R MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KARRI SATYA GOPINATH (SC FOR APSIDC LTD) 2.S HARINATH REDDY(SC FOR AP S IRRI DEV COR) The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitsthat
the cause in the writ petition would not survive anyfurther.
Recordiipg the submission of the learned counsel for the ;'v petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall ■' ' 4 t be no order as to costs.* 4"
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall standclosed.
SDI- M. PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
nm
i
HIGH COURT
DATED:04/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.7830 of 2011
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Sk. Meeraiah
The Vice Chairman & Managing Director, APSIDC
The Executive Engineer, APSIDC Divisional Office
HARINATH.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
