Writ petition challenging arbitrary seniority lists was dismissed as abated after counsel submitted that the petitioner was expired with no legal heirs on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 7788 OF 2021
Between:
T.Anthony, S/o Bairagi, Aged 50 years, Occ: Armed ReserveHeadConstable (904), District Armed Reserve Office, Etcherla, Srikakulam, Srikakulam District.
...PETITIONER
AND
0K
10.J. Someshwarrao, ( 149) Armed Reserve Sub Inspector,District Armed Reserve Office, Visakhapatanam Rural, Visakhapatnam.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in issuing impugned G.O.Ms.No.108 Home (Services-ll) Dept dated 06.09.2019 and consequential revised final seniority list of Armed Reserved Head Constables of Srikakulam District vide G.O.Ms.No.28, Home (Ser-ll) Dept dt.12.2.2020 and final integrated seniority list of Armed Reserve Head Constables of Visakhapatnam Range issued vide Memorandum C.NO.131/A4/2019 dated 11.03.2020 as highly arbitrary, illegal, contrary to rules and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same in so far as the petitioner is concerned and place the name of the petitioner over and above the names of the respondents 6 to 10 and award all consequential benefits such as promotion as Armed Reserve Sub Inspector w.e.f., the date of promotions of his juniorsetc.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. M KESAVA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6 to 10: The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010133142021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH SMB AT AMARAVATI
[3310]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
"s
THURSDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 7788/2021
Between;
T.anthony
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.M KESAVARAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Mr M.Kesava Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner,submitsthatthe petitioner was expired and as he has no legal heirstobringthemonrecord, the Writ Petition may be closed.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition isdismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands
To,
//TRUE COPY//
assistant registrar
SECTION OFFICER
ss
HIGH COURT DATED:04/07/2024
ORDER
WP.No.7788 of 2021
i 2 5 NOV 2C2’) I
^ . Current Section ^
S PATC
a/> DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
I
/
T. Anthony
The State of Andhra Pradesh
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
