Writ petition challenging an employee's suspension in the Endowments Department was dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted that the cause no longer survived for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
'i
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 3221 OF 2021
Between:
V. Emmanuel Raju, S/o. Late Bapi Raju, Aged 53 years,Occ..SeniorAsst,in Sri Gowtami Jeevakarunya Sangam, R/o. 62-11, 5/11, Siddartha Nagar, Rajamahendravaram, E.G. District.
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring theaction of the 2nd
«Jf
respondent in issuing the Memo in Rc.No.V2/20024/25/2020 dated 29.01.2021 and the consequential proceedings of the 3rd respondent in Letter No.30/2020 dated 01.02.2021 keeping the petitioner under suspension as bad, illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction, non-application of mind, abuse of power and violative of principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 16 & 21 of Constitution of India and consequentlysetasidethe impugned memo in Rc.No.V2/20024/25/2020 dated 29.01.2021 issued by the 2nd respondent.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of memo in Rc.No.V2/20024/25/20 20 dated 29.01.2021 issued by the 2nd respondent and consequential proceedings of the 3rd proceedings dated 01.02.2021.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. D V SASIDHAR
Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2: GP FOR SERVICES II
Counsel for the Respondent 3: SRI K. MADHAVA REDDY,SCFOR ENDOWMENTS AR
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010051362021
SSH 0-^
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
THURSDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 3221 OF 2021
Between:
V. Emmanuel Raju
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S) State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.D VSASIDHAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. K. Srinivas, learned counsel, representing Mr. D.V.Sasidhasr, learned counselforthepetitioner submitted that the cause in this Writ Petition doesnotsurviveanyfurtherfor adjudication and became infructuous.
In view of the said submission made by the learnedcounsel,theWrit Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as tocosts.
The miscellaneous applications pending,
To,
pending, if any, shallalsostandclosed. Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI //TRUE COPY// assistant REGSITRAR sect^6"n^ FICER
HIGH COURT
DATE0:04/07/2024
ORDER
WP.No.3221 of 2021
DISMISSING THE WP4WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
V. Emmanuel Raju
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Revenue (Endowments) Department
The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Gollapudi, Vijayawada Krishna District
Sri Gowtami Jeevakarunya Sangam, Rep. by its Executive Officer, Rajamahendravaram
K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
