Dismissed

S. Mahaboob Basha, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC3 Jul 2024WP/655/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition regarding the petitioner's absorption into a grant-in-aid post, the Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court recorded the counsel's submission that the cause of action did not survive. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition as infructuous without costs and closed pending interlocutory applications.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.

S. Mahaboob Basha, Vs State of Andhra… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

• ^ \

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 655 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

S. Mahaboob Bash^ S/o. S. Kasim, aged about 37 years, Lecturer, Osmania College, Kurnool, R/o. H,No.40-38F, K.E. Madanna Nagar, Opp Anand Theatre, Bangarpeta, Kurnool 518 004, A.P.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi- 522 503 Guntur District.

¶12

^ Special Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Government of AndhS Pradlsh Vijayawada Director of Collegiate Education, Kadapa Region,

¶13

Opposite to All India Radio (AIR). Kadapa - A.P. ^

¶14

The Secretary and Correspondent, Osmania College, 11/9 Peta Osmania College Road, Kurnool, Andhra Pradesh 518001.’

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or direction declaring the inaction of the respondents 1 to 3 in not absorbing the petitioner into the vacant grant-in-aid post in the department of Commerce by duly considering the recommendations of the 4*^ respondent dt. 31.12.2015, 30.08.2016 and 25.09.2019 is illegal, arbitrary highhanded, violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct

¶17

the respondents to absorb the petitioner in the grant-in-aid post in the department of Commerce in the 4'^ respondent college where the petitioner is working since more than 14 years.

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the recommendations of the 4*^ respondent dt. 31.12.2015 30.08.2016 and 25.09.2019 in absorbing the petitioner in the grant-in-aid post in the department of Commerce in the 4'^ respondent college where the petitioner is working since more than 14 years, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI Y. V. ANIL KUMAR

¶21

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following: ORDER

[3310]

APHC010008772021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶27

THURSDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶28

PRESENT

¶29

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶30

WRIT PETITION NO: 655/2021

Between:

S. Mahaboob Basha,

...PETITIONER

AND

State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶36

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶37

1.Y VANIL KUMAR

¶38

Counsel for the RespondentfS):

¶39

1.GP FOR EDUCATION 2.GP FOR SERVICES III

¶40

The Court made the following:

¶41

ORDER:

¶42

Mr.Y.V.Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner,^{submitsthatthe} cause in the writ petition does not survive and it^{hasbecomeinfructuous.}

¶43

Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is^dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

¶44

shall stands As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending,

¶45

closed.

¶46

//TRUE COPY//

¶47

SD/- G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶48

SECTION OFFICER

¶49

¶50

One CC to Sri Y. V. Anil Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]

¶51

Two CCs to GP for Services III, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶52

Three C.D. Copies.

Cnr

X..

HIGH COURT

DATED;04/07/2024

ORDER

WP.No.655 of 2021

DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCUTOUS WITHOUT COSTS

S. Mahaboob Basha, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Mahaboob Basha, v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

MD Abdul Khadar Vs the State of Ap

N. Harinath Babu Vs Government of India

B Someswa Anjaneya Raju Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

E. S. Sai Prasad, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

V. Emmanuel Raju, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

T.Anthony Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh