Dismissed

Gokula Krishna Rice Mill v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC26 Mar 2024WP/7740/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition regarding the declaration of the corporation's action in recalling bank guarantees as illegal and granted permission for delivery of CMR rice. The writ petition was dismissed vide its withdrawal.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted permission to withdraw the writ petition, which was then dismissed.

Gokula Krishna Rice Mill Vs The State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCh TWOTHOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR j

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7740 OF 2023

¶6

Between:

¶7

Gokula Krishna Rice Mill, rep by its Managing Partner Nimmakalaya Venkatewarlu, S/o Sinayya, aged 46 years, Occ: Business, R/o 6-217/2, Ishammai Street, Kavali, Nellore, SPSR Nellore^District.

¶8

...Petitioner/s

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi,^{GunturDistrict.}

¶11

The Andhra Pradesh Civil Supplies Corporation, Rep., by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Kanuru, Vijayawada.

¶12

The District Collector (Civil Supplies), SPSR NELLORE District, at NELLORE.

¶13

The Joint Collector (Civil Supplies), SPSR NELLORE District at NELLORE.

¶14

The Andhra Pradesh Civil Supplies Corporation, Rep., by its District Manager, Civil Supplies Bhavan, SPSR NELLORE, NELLORE.

¶15

The District Supplies Officer, Civil Supplies Bhavan, SPSR NELLORE, NELLORE. .

¶16

The Union Bank, Kavali Branch, SPSR Nellore District, rep by its Branch Manager,

¶17

The Food Corporation of India, rep by its General Manager, Regional Office, Rajanarendra Building, Patamata, Vijayawada

¶18

...Respondents

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India^{prayingthatin}

¶20

. ,..the«circumstances stated in the affidavit filed^{therewith,theHighCourtmay} V* Writ Order or Direction more particularly one in the

¶21

be\pleased to issue nature^f Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent^{corporationin}

¶22

.. >^'ncasl7ment of the bank guarantees for an amount^{ofRs.33,99999/-without} -rece'iving the balance CMR or paddy from the petitioner^{isillegal,arbitrary,} against the principles of Natural Justice apart from^{violationofArt19(1)(g)} 300-A of Constitution of India, consequentially to^{directtherespondentsto} accord permission to the petitioners for delivery of^{balancequantityofCMR} rice of 2020-21 RABI season by restoring the Bank guarantee of the Petitioner

¶23

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedin} the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the^{HighCourtmaybepleasedto} direct the respondent corporation to revoke (restore)^{theBankGaurantees} provided by the petitioner by accord permission to^{thepetitionersfordelivery} of balance quantity of CMR rice of 2020-21 RABI season,^{pendingdisposal} of the above writ petition

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. Jami Madhavi

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 1,3, 4 & 6: GP for^{CIVILSUPPLIES} Counsel for the Respondent No’s. 2 & 5: SRI HEMACHANDRA^SCFOR CIVIL SUPPLIES CORP.

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent No.8: Sri. S Syam Sunder^Rao,SCFOR FOOD CORP OF INDIA

¶28

The Court made the following:

APHC010150122023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶33

WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶34

[3233]

¶35

PRESENT

¶36

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN

¶37

WRIT PETITION NO: 7740/2023

¶38

Between:

¶39

Gokula Krishna Rice Mill

¶40

...PETITIONER

¶41

AND

¶42

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

¶43

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶44

Counsel for the Petitioner;

¶45

1.JAMI MADHAVI

¶46

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶47

1.GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

¶48

2.SSYAMSUNDER RAO

¶49

The Court made the following Order:

¶50

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission^ofthis Court to withdraw the writ petition.

¶51

Permission is accorded.

¶52

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order if any deemed n.ave been vacated. No^costs.

¶53

¶54

As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any,^shallstand

¶55

closed.

¶56

SD/- V. SAVITHRI GOWRI

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

One CC to Sri. Jami Madhavi Advocate [OPUC]

¶62

One CC to SRI HEMACHANDRA SC FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES CORP. [OPUC]

¶63

One CC to Sri. S Syam Sunder Rao, SC FOR FOOD CORP^OFINDIA [OPUC]

¶64

Two CCs to GP for CIVIL SUPPLIES, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶65

Three CD Copies

¶66

SAM

¶67

¶68

high court DATED:27/03/2024

¶69

ORDER

¶70

WP.No.7740 of 2023

¶71

CX
15 1 7 DEC 202^ n
^ Current lecUon

¶72

DISMISSING THIS WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

Gokula Krishna Rice Mill v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gokula Krishna Rice Mill v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Damodarreddy, and 14 Others, Vs M/S Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

M/s. Harshini Car Travels, Vs the Airport Director

M/s. Standard Infratech India Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt. Meduri Chamundeswari, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Kollabathula Ravi Teja Vs the Union of India

Ravulapally Ravindranath, Vs The Union of India