A writ petition concerning alleged errors in a cooperative bank's loan repayment schedule and a subsequent sale notice was dismissed for non-prosecution, no counsel appearing for the petitioner despite the matter being listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 6763 OF 2024
Between:
...PETITIONER-
AND
...RESPONDENTS,
f
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order or direction more •• V particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 3 to 5 in violating the conditions of the Subsidy Sanction Proceedings issued by 2 nd respondent vide proceedings No.MIDH/ PHMMPU/ 502/2018-19, dt 14-09-2019 while drawing/calculating the repayment schedule of the petitioners loan account and not rectifying the same even after reporting the same by the petitioner and proceeding further under Sec. 103 of Co-Operative Societies Act and issuing sale notice/FORM-8 dated27/02/2024under Rule 52 and 16 of AP Co-Operative Societies Rules onthebasisofthe unlawful and illegal calculation of the loan account as unjust, illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to rectify the loan repayment schedule calculations and restructure the loan repayment schedule as per the terms and conditions of the SubsidySanction Proceedings No.MIDH/PHM/MPU/502/2018-19, dt 14-09-2019 of 2 nd respondent, by suspending the sale notice/FORM-8 dated27-02-2024 issued by the 6*^ respondent in the interests of justice. ^
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 1^1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 3 to 6 to rectify the repayment schedule calculation errors committed by them for the Loan Account No.610000010475 of the petitioner, in terms of the Conditions of the Subsidy Proceedings No.MIDH/ PHM/MPU/ 502/ 2018-19, dt: 14-09-2019 and until then not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner’s pledged properties and loan account pending the Writ Petition in this Hon’ble Court.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the sale notice/FORM-8 dated 27/02/2024 issued by the 6th respondent pending the Writ Petition in this Hon’bleCourt
lA NO: 3 OF 2024
Between:
...Petitioners/Respondents No. 3 and 5
AND
...Petitioner
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the Interim Order, dated 21.03.2024 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.P.No.6763 of 2024 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI DHARANI KUMAR B
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI BRAHMANANDA REDDYSOMASANI (SC FOR AP STATE COOPERATIVE BANK)
The Court made the following: Order
APHC010131072Q24
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
[3330]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 6763/2024
Between:
Karthikeya Traders
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.DHARAN1 KUMAR B
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.BRAHMANANDA REDDY SOMASANl (SC for AP State
Cooperative Bank)
2.GP FOR COOPERATION
2
r
The Court made the following order:-
Despite the matter being posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, it evinces that the petitioner has no interest to prosecute the case.
Hence, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any.
shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUT^EGISTRAR SEC^^J-O^^RCER
To,
fN r\
HIGH COURT DATED:04/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.6763 of 2024
I* W APR 2025 ^
^ . Current oecuon . ^
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS
Karthikeya Traders
The State of Andhra Pradesh
The Mission Director and Commissioner of Horticulture, MIDH, AP
The AP State Cooperative Bank Ltd. (APCOB)
The Professional Director (Accountancy), The AP State Cooperative Bank Ltd.
The Branch Manager, The AP State Cooperative Bank Ltd., Mangalagiri
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
