The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the Tribunal erroneously granted huge amount of compensation and fastened liability on the appellant/respondent No.2 without duly appreciating that the driver has no valid driving license. She further submits that huge amount of compensation was granted by awarding Rs.1,00,000/- towards grievous injuries, Rs.1,50,000/- towards pain and suffering besides Rs.1,17,700/- towards medical expenses and further sum of Rs.10,000/- for transport and Rs. 10,000/for attending charges and Rs.15,000/- towards extra nourishment. She further stated that there was delay in lodging the FIR and that the names are also not tallying. She also submitted that in the FIR, K.Jhon Babu, was the driver of the offending Motor Vehicle, whereas the other crime record such as complaint shows the name of K. Kumar as the driver. Accordingly, the claim petition was filed against K.Kumar and in this regard, the Tribunal failed to consider the evidence of respondent No.2/RW3 in which there was an admission that he has no valid driving license and thus he was implanted for getting compensation from the appellant. She further stated that the claim petition is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties who are the owner and insurer of the crime vehicle, which the claimant was driving. Considering the above submissions and the grounds of the appeal, upon perusal of the impugned
