Civil revision petition challenging an interlocutory order in a matrimonial original petition; counsel submitted the matter had become infructuous due to subsequent developments, and the High Court dismissed the petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2984 OF 2023
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, aggrieved by the orders passed by the court on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Kovur, SPSR Nellore District, in I.A. No.386 of 2022 in H.M.O.P.No.66 of 2021 dated 11-7-2023.
Between:
Udatha Sukumar, S/o Srinivasulu Yadav, Aged 27 years, R/o Jangam Street, Kovur Village and Mandal, SPSR Nellore District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend I.A. No. 386 of 2022 in H.M. O.P. No. 66 of 2021 on the file of the court of Senior Civil Judge, Kovur, SPSR NelloreDistrictin the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Kum. Grandhi Priyanka
Counselfor the Respondents:—
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.-ZQRA OF 2023
Between Udatha Sukumar
Dt.OS. 1.2024
and ... Petitioner
Udatha Rajani, W/o.Udatha Sukumar, and another
... Respondents Counsel for petitioner : Kum.Grandhi Priyanka Counsel for respondents:
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that mi view of the subsequent developments, the matter has become infructuous. The said submission ISi recorded.
- Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
ACHARI //TRUE COPY// assistai^registrar <^"5r^CTION OFFICER 2 One Cc’to'lO.m' SPSR Nellore District " ^Sco°“r at Amaravati.
To,
ssb
9:^
HIGH COURT
DATED:08/01/2024
ORDER
CRP.No.2984 of 2023
^ CoPfks 2S\2-\2-lfD5L-
'if
U4C ^
V® 1
% «
2
DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS V® WITHOUT COSTS %
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Udatha Sukumar
Udatha Rajani
Udatha Sunanvi (rep. by her mother/natural guardian)
Ninala Jayasurya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
