Dismissed

Paidikondala Lakshmi Kumari v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC13 Mar 2024WP/5305/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a Section 145 Cr.P.C. executive magistrate order restraining entry to land in Eluru was withdrawn by the petitioner seeking liberty to pursue alternative remedies; the High Court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw writ petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy under law; no costs.

Paidikondala Lakshmi Kumari Vs the State of Andhra… — Property and Title | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR i

¶3

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO: 5305 OF 2024

¶5

Between;

¶6

Paidikondala Lakshmi Kumari, S/o. Srinivasu, Aged about 45 years, Occ Household, R/o.Dr.No.2-36, Gavaravaram, Savarapupeta Post, Eluru West Godavari District.

¶7

...PETITIONER

¶8

AND

¶9

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur^District.

¶10

The Superintendent of Police, Eluru District, Eluru.

¶11

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Eluru, Eluru District.

¶12

The Inspector of Police, Eluru III- Town Eluru, Eluru District.

¶13

The Sub-inspector of Police, Eluru III- Town, Eluru District.

¶14

The Tahsildar- Cum - Executive Magistrate, , Eluru Urban, Eluru, Eluru District.

¶15

Jonnakuti Rammohana Rao, S/o. Ganga Raju, Aged 55^YearsOcc Business, R/o.Dr.No.6-78, Indira Colony, 25*^ Division, Sanivarapupeta Eluru, Eluru District. ’

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the orders in Me.No.235/2024, Dt. 22.02.2024 issued under Sub-Sec.(i) of Sec. 145 Cr.P.C. issued by the 6 respondent in directing to implement the orders U/Sec.145 Cr.P.C. prohibiting the entry of the petitioner and occupation of the said land

¶18

admeasuring 336sq.yds in RS.No.35/3. a house site and a asbestos sheet house (Shed) bounded by EAST Veeramachineni Sri Rama Kumar SOUTH Mekapati Uma Devi, WEST Road Length with 33 feet and NORTH Nami Satyavati of Gavaravaram Village, H/o. Sanivarapupeta Panchayat, Eluru Mandal and District as bad. illegal, arbitrary, violative of Article 14,16,19,21 and 300A of the constitution of India and consequently setaside the same in the interest of justice.

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order Dt.22.02.2024 made in Me.No.235/2024 issued by the 6'*^ respondent pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI UDAY KUMAR VAMPUGADAVALA

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 : GP FOR HOME

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : GP FOR REVENUE

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent No.7 : NONE APPEARED

¶25

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶26

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY

¶27

Writ Petition No.53Q5 of 2024

¶28

Order;

¶29

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission^ofthisCourt to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to avail the alternative remedy available under law.

¶30

Permission is granted.

¶31

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner herein to avail the alternative remedy

¶32

available to her under law. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending

¶34

in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶35

To,

¶36

SD/- U. SRIDEVI //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT Registrar SECT OFFICER

¶37

One CC to Sri Uday Kumar Vampugadavala , Advocate [OPUC]

¶38

Two CCs to GP for Home, [ High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶39

Two CCs to GP for Revenue , High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶40

Three C.D, Copies.

Cnr

HIGH COURT

DATED:14/03/2024

ORDER

WP.No.5305 of 2024

X t nr.T 20V-

DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

Paidikondala Lakshmi Kumari v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paidikondala Lakshmi Kumari v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

. Gurram Rachana Vs Gurram Gayathri

Bode Ramachandra Yadav Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Paritala Kishore Vs Male Venkateshwarlu Foster

Deshapogu Ramudu Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Surisetty Surya Narayana, Vs The State of Andra Pradesh

Ravi Ramesh Babu Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh