Partly allowed

. Gurram Rachana v. Gurram Gayathri

Andhra Pradesh HC12 Mar 2024CRLP/453/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the criminal petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of DV Act proceedings. Relying on a common order in Crl. Petition 599/2023, the court dispensed with the petitioner's presence in lower court trials. Note requires attaching the batch order.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's presence in the Court below dispensed with except when the Magistrate deems it necessary. Miscellaneous applications in the petition are closed.

. Gurram Rachana Vs Gurram Gayathri — Domestic Violence | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

APHC010024292024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

[3327]

¶5

WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 453/2024

¶8

Between: . Gurram Rachana ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶9

AND Gurram Gayathri and ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Others Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1.A PADMA Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.

¶10

2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:

¶11

¶12

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY

¶13

CRIMINAL PETITION No.453 OF 2024

¶14

Order:

¶15

This Criminal Petition, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘CrPC’), is filed by the petitioner herein to quash the proceedings in DVC No.16 of 2021 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Special Mobile Court, Kadapa, initiated against her by the respondent No.1 under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short, ‘the DVC Act, 2005’).

¶16

Today, when the matter came up for admission, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner and acceded to, by the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor that the subject matter of this Criminal Petition is squarely covered by the common order passed by this Court in Criminal Petition No.599 of 2023 and batch, dated 16.03.2023, wherein this Court held thus.

¶17

“13. In view of the aforesaid reasons stated supra, it can be inferred that since the proceedings under the DVC Act, 2005 are civil in

¶18

¶19

nature, the provisions of CrPC may not apply, is too general and vague. Instances would arise where an aggrieved person also would have to seek the relief in respect of all the petitions filed before the jurisdictional Magistrate, and the option left to her would only be by way of initiating proceedings under Section 482 CrPC with certain self-imposed restrictions. In view of the principle laid down in Nandkishior Pralhad Vyawahare v. Mangala case (3 supra), this Court is of the opinion that inherent power of the High Court can be invoked subject to self-imposed restrictions, including availability of an efficacious alternative remedy under Section 29 of the DVC Act, 2005, so as to adhere to redressal of their grievances arising out of the orders passed in a proceedings under Sections 12, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23 and offences under Section 31 of the DVC Act, 2005.

¶20

“14. The present Criminal Petitions are filed seeking to quash the proceedings initiated against the petitioners under the provisions of the DVC Act, 2005. Though various contentions have been raised in the petitions, the only grievance of the petitioners is that their presence may be dispensed with, in the proceedings before the Court below. Having considered the submissions of the learned counsel, this Court dispenses with the presence of the petitioners, who are relatives of husband, except husband, before the Court below, except on those

¶21

¶22

occasions when the learned Magistrate feels that their presence is necessary.

¶23

With the aforesaid observations and directions, the Criminal Petitions are disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Petitions, shall stand closed.”

¶24

Hence, following the said order passed by this Court in Criminal Petition No.599 of 2023 and batch, dated 16.03.2023 and for the reasons mentioned therein, this Criminal Petition is disposed of dispensing with the presence of the petitioner, before the Court below, except on those occasions when the learned Magistrate feels that her presence is necessary.

¶25

As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if

¶26

any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

¶27

____________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J.

¶28

Date:13.3.2024 GR Note : Office to attach copy of common order in Criminal Petition No.599 of 2023 and batch, dated 16.03.2023, to this order. (B/O) GR

¶29

¶30

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY

¶31

CRIMINAL PETITION No.453 OF 2024 Date:13.03.2024

¶32

. Gurram Rachana v. Gurram Gayathri

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

. Gurram Rachana v. Gurram Gayathri

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manne Rathna Kumari Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Bandarupalli Vinaya Kumar Vs the State of Ap

Suvvada Narayana Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Bode Ramachandra Yadav Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Paritala Kishore Vs Male Venkateshwarlu Foster

Elindra Masthan Ravikumar at Ravi Kumar, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh