This order closes Writ Petition No. 5074 of 2017 (filing date 2017, decided 2024) involving alleged assaults during a police enquiry over a civil land dispute. The Court found no legal basis for adjudication and disposed of the matter without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
••
\ ^
\K <br>■ 1 o
.<2
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5074 OF 2017
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring theaction of the 2nd respondent though petitioners requested personally that the Respondents 3, 4 & 5 are assaulting the petitioners and also Superintendent of Police, Kadapa recommended to take action but 2nd respondent not responded as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 16, 19 (1) (g) of Constitution of India.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 6184 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 2nd respondent by protecting the petitioners land to an extent of ac 2-59 cents in Sy No. 369/2 and Sy No.369/3situated in Chiyyaram Village, Railway Koduru Mandal, Kadapa District by providing police protection.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SMT. A PADMA
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010024222017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3310] AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 5074/2017
Between:
Gundala Peda Chengaiah, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Its ...RESPONDENT(S) Principle and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.APADMA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following:
This Writ Petition is filed, under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
Issue an appropriate writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of mandamusdeclaring the action of the 2nd respondent though petitioners requested personally that the Respondents 3 4 5 are assaulting the petitioners and also Superintendent of Police Kadapa recommended to take action but 2nd respondent not responded as illegal arbitrary and violation of Article 14 16 19 1 g of Constitution of India and pass....”
- Learned counsel, Ms.Lakshmi Pryanvita, appeared on behalf of Ms.A.Padma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearingfor the official respondents is present and furnished a copyof Written Instructions issued by Sub Inspector of Police, RailwayKoduru
Police Station, Kadapa District.
2
3
Vior
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, ifany.
shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/SHAIK WIOHD. RAFI assistant registrar
SECTION OFFICER
To, PADMA Advocate [OPUC] 1. One CC to SRI- A Court Of Andhra Pradesh for home (AP) ,High 2 Two CCs to GP [OUT]
KKK
HIGH COURT
DATED:02/05/2024
ORDER
WP.No.5074 of 2017
X cco 7n?i, m
o»
. Curreni Seclion
:s:t£espATC^lS;^^
CLOSING THE W.P. WITHOUT COSTS
Gundala Peda Chengaiah and Others
State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Principal Secretary Home Department
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
