Writ petition challenging the petitioner's inclusion as a History Sheeter (History Sheet no.772/AN) was dismissed as infructuous after counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause of action did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 31505 OF 2017
Between:
Sri P.Ramanjineyulu, S/o Venkatadraiah, Aged: 28 years,Occ::Pujari, R/o H.no.4-96 A, BC colony, Thondapadu, Anantapur District
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction moreparticularlyoneinnature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents2to4inkeeping the name of the petitioner in the list of History Sheetersasillegal,arbitrary, against principles of natural justice and consequently direct the
e-
Respondents to close the History Sheet with no.772/ANopenedagainstthe petitioner.
; " I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 39231 OF 2017)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to direct the Respondent no. 4 to not to callthepetitionertothe police station regularly without any case being pending,pendingdisposalof the writ petition before this Hon'ble court.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. N CHANDRA SEKHARREDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME(AP)
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010044692017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3310]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 31505/2017
Between:
P.ramanjineyulu
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME (AP)
2.15516/GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER
Mr.V.Appa Rao, learned counsel, representing Mr.N.ChandraSekhar
Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitsthatthecauseofactionin this Writ Petition does not survive and the matterhasbecomeinfructuous.
In view of the submission made by learned counsel appearingonbehalf of the petitioner, the present Writ Petition is dismissedas infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, ifany,shallstand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/-SHA1K MOHD RA^ assistant registrar
SE^N1^)FFICER
To,
Sekhar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 1. OneCCto Sri. N Chandra Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] GP For Home (AP) ,High 2. Two CCS to
AL
HIGH COURT
DATED:02/05/2024
ORDER
WP.No.31505 of 2017
m
I 17 FEB 2C2j Co
^ . Current Section
PATC
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Sri P.Ramanjineyulu
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Home
The Superintend Of Police, Anantapur
The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Tadipatri
The Station House Officer, Gooty Police Station, Gooty, Anantapur District
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
