Petitioners sought to restrain demolition of residential structures at Pippara village pending an appeal against a Gram Panchayat order. On learning an earlier writ petition on the same dispute was already decided and a writ appeal was pending, they withdrew this petition, which the court dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 458 OF 2024
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
,9. Vigisena Nagaraju, S/o Venkata Raju, aged about Major, R/o. Pippara Village Village
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Petition, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the high handed action on the part of respondents herein threatening the petitioners influenced by the unofficial respondents to disposes/ demolition of residential dwelling houses/ structures at NA Road of Pippara village ganapavaram mandal in RS no 310/2B adjacent to the R and B state highway road, pendency of the Appeal before the Dist panchayati officer/3rd respondent dt 1-1-2024 as against the orders of the Pippara gram panchayat/4th respondent in RC No 2/2023 dt 20-12-2023 by requesting grant of time 6 months to vacate the premises as highly illegal arbitrary and violative of 14,16,21 of constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents not to remove/ demolish the residential houses/structures in survey no 31B of 2B of Pippara Gram panchayat pendency of the Appeal before the Dist panchayat officer/3rd respondent dt 1-1-2024 for a grant of 6months'time to vacate the premises in view of the orders in RC No 2/2023 dt 20-12-2023 Pippara gram panchayat/4‘^ respondent.
lA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to remove/ demolish theresidentialhouses/structuresin survey no 31B of 2B of Pippara Gram panchayat pendency of the Appeal before the Dist panchayat officer/3rd respondent dt 1-1-2024 for a grant of 6 months' time to vacate the premises in view of the orders in RcNo2/2023 dt 20-12-2023 Pippara gram panchayat/4 th respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. BOKKA SATYANARAYANAKAMLA
Counsel for the Respondents No.1,3: GP FOR PANCHAYATRAJRURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI. N. SRIHARI, SCFORGRAM PANCHAYAT
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GP FOR ROADS AND BUILDINGS
Counsel for the Respondent No.6: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondents No. 7,8: —
Counsel for the Respondent No.9: SRI. M. SRI ATCHYUT
The Court made the following: OREER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATHI
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.458 of 2024
Dt:05.01.2024
Between
Indhukuri Murali Krishnam and others
Petitioners
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, and others
Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners : M/s.Sri Bokka Satyanarayana Counsel for the respondents : The G.P for PR 86 RD The G.P for Revenue The G.P for Higher Education Mr. Sri Atchyut
ORDER:
At the time of considering the matter, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Gram Panchayat, had broughttothenotice of this Court that petitioners have filed W.P.No.33215 of 2023 and considering the said writ petition, a learned Judge of this Court passed orders dated 26.12.2023 against which a Writ Appeal has also preferred, which is yet to be numbered. 2. In view of the submissions made, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
\
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSIST^T REGISTRAR /
OFFICER
}
HIGH COURT
' .<4 I
DATED:05/01/2024
ORDER
WP.No.458 of 2024
DF ANO/y^SSs
'PX
5 1 2 MAR 2024 o<br>o>
Current Section
S P AT C VA
VVX
%/ ViM
DISMISSING THEWP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Indhukuri Murali Krishnam Raju and others
The State of Andhra Pradesh
Vemulamanda Venkataraju
Korapati Naresh Babu
Vigisena Nagaraju
Ninala Jayasurya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
