Writ petition challenging a tender notification issued for supply of agriculture and allied sector equipment was not pressed; the petitioner sought withdrawal citing subsequent developments, and the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 31694 OF 2023
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Petition, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents No. 1 and 2 in issuing the impugned notification in Ref APSAIDCL/ASC/GS/2023-2 4/005 dt 28.11.2023 which was published on 29.11.2023 i Sakshi Newspaper under the caption of ‘2"'^ Phase Short' Inviting Eol (Expression Of Interest) For Supply Of Agriculture And Allied Sector, Agro Industry And Food Processing Related Equipment/Machinery/MaterialsAndFood Equipment and Machinery For Land Development Activities During The Year 2023-24 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and discriminatory and contrary to the tender conditions apart from settled principles of law and consequently set aside the same.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the Impugned notification in Ref: APSAIDCL/ASC/GS/2023-24/005 dt; 28.11.2023 which as published on 29.11.2023 in Sakshi Newspaper under the caption of 2nd Phase Short Inviting Eol (Expression Of Interest) For Supply Of Agriculture And Allied Sector, Agro Industry And Food Processing Related Equipment/ Machinery/ Materials And Equipment And Machinery For Land Development Activities During The Year 2023-24 issued by the 1st respondent, m the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRI. G. L. NAGESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondents No.1,2: SRI. P. SASI VARDHAN
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR AGRICULTURE
The Court made the following ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATHI HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.31694 of 2023
Dt:05.01.2Q24
Between: -
Shree Karthik Agro Indsutries, Rep., by its Managing Partner, K.V.Manohar Reddy Petitioner
And
The State of Andhra Pradesh, AGRO Industries Development Corporation Limited, and others
Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Mr.G.L.Nageswara Rao Counsel for the respondents : The G.P for Agriculture
Mr.P.Sasi Vardhan Reddy
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, who states that in view of the subsequent developments, the petitioner is not intending to
pursue the writ petition and seeks to withdraw the same.
In view of the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- A VIJAYABABU ASSISTANT ^I^TRAR SECTION OFFICER
To,
X One CC to SRI. G.L. NAGESWAR RAO Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI.P. SASI VARDHAN Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to AGRICULTURE, High Court of Andhra Pradesh[OUTl 4. Three C.D.Copies nm
Madhu
HIGH COURT
DATED:05/01/2024
ORDER
WP.No.31694 of 2023
DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
Shree Karthik Agro Industries, Rep. by its Managing Partner K.V. Manohar Reddy
The Andhra Pradesh State Agro Industries Development Corporation Limited, Rep. by its Vice Chairman and Managing Director
The General Manager, The Andhra Pradesh State Agro Industries Development Corporation Limited
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Co-operation Department
Ninala Jayasurya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
