A writ petition challenging the non-release of title deeds was dismissed for non-prosecution after multiple adjournments due to the petitioner's absence. The court directed closure of pending miscellaneous petitions.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
»-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) i THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY I TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR '
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION NO: 8292 OF 2018
Between:
M/s. Sri Madhava Reddy Rice Mill, Rep.by its Proprietor, V.Sudha Rani W/o V.Madhava Reddy, R/o Madanapalli, Chittoor District.
...PETITIONER AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondent in not releasing the Title Deeds in respect of the property situated in Sy.Nos. 126/8 and 126-7A total extent of Ac 1-48 cents of 105-Bandaruvaripalle village, Kammapalle Panchayath, Pulicherla Mandal, Chittoor district as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violativeof Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3 rd respondent herein to release the Title Deeds mortgaged by pre-closing the Bank guarantee and mortgaged property of Sy.No. 126/8 and 126-7A situated at 105-Bandaruvaripalli village,Kammapalle Panchayath, Pulicherla Mandal, Chittoor District.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3'^' respondent herein not to take any steps with regard to the
pjroperty belonging to the petitioner situated in Sy.No.126/8and126-7Aof105- Bapdaruvaripalle village, Kammapalle Panchayath, PulicherlaMandal, Chittoor District, which is under simple mortgage to it pending disposal of the main Writ
■' ^petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D. V. S. SITA RAMA RAJU
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: SRI Y. V. ANIL KUMAR (Central
Government Counsel)
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: M/s. S. SIVA KUMARI
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
WRIT PETITION No.8292 OF 2018
Dt.04.1.2024
Between:-
M/s.Sri Madhava Reddy Rice Mill, Rep. by its Proprietor V.Sudha Rani, W/o.V.Madhava Reddy
... Petitioner
and
The Union of India, Rep. by its Under Secretary, Departmentof Ministry of Finance, New Delhi, and others
... Respondents
Counsel for petitioner Counsel for respondents:
Mr.D.V.S.S. Raju
Mr.Y.V.Anil Kumar Ms.S.Siva Kumari
ORDER:
The matter was listed on 07.12.2023 and as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, it wasdirected to be listed on 21.12.2023. Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 21.12.2023,the matter was directed to be listed on 28.12.2023 under the caption “For Orders”. Though the matter was listedunder the caption “For Orders” on 28.12.2023, since therewas no representation on behalf of the petitioner, it wasdirectedto be listed on 04.1.2024 (today) under the caption For Dismissal”. Even today also, there is no representation on
2
behalf of the petitioner. It seems that the petitionerisnot interested to prosecute the matter.
- Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions
pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT ^^STRAR SECTION OFFICER
To,
ssb gl
\
^lOH COURT •« V" s DATED:04/01/2024
ORDER
WP.No.8292 of 2018
Scopffcs 26)3)24 t>SL
DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Sri Madhava Reddy Rice Mill
The Union of India
The Reserve Bank of India
The Branch Manager, Canara Bank
NINALA JAYASURYA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
