Writ petition dismissed as infructuous upon the petitioner's counsel submitting that the cause of action no longer survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010030682015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 42804/2015
Between:
St.mark Educational Institution Society and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Sri K.Santhan Rao, learned counsel, representing Sri P.Pandu Ranga Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive, as such the matter has become infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
_______________________
JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
Dated 06.03.2024 Pnr
St.mark Educational Institution Society and Others
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
V.Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
