A writ petition challenging the exclusion of a college from ECET lateral-entry counselling for B.Tech admissions was dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the cause no longer survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
%
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWOTHOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR ^
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 20867 OF 2015
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 3 in
.ii
<
of counseling for allotment of not including the petitioner in the process students in respect of theintake iofthepetitionercollegesinECET-lateral nd of the B.Tech courses approved in the entry quota directly into the 2 year 2015-2016 on the ground that the petitioner colleges for the academic year petitioners had "Zero" intake in respect of the undergraduateengineering courses for the academic year 2014-15 as arbitrary and illegaloffending consequential direction to the Article 14 of the Constitution and issue a respondents to include the petitioner college for thepurposeofcounseling and allotment of students in lateral entry quota inthe2"“yearoftheB.Tech courses.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 26857 OF 2015)
that in the circumstances Petition under Section 151 CPC praying stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writpetition,theHighCourtmay respondents 1 to 4 to include the petitioner and the be pleased to direct the respective intake of the petitioner college for theongoingcounselingandthe lind phase of counseling scheduled to begin after the 1st Phase of counseling, and allot students in the counseling process initiated by the 4th respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRi VENKAT CHALLA Counsei for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR HiGHER EDUCATION(AP) Counsei for the Respondent No.2: SRi I. MADHU BABU,SCFORJNTUK Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: SR^C. SUDESH ANANDfSC FOR
APSCHE)
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
APHCO10083642015 in THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ' :: AMARAVATI
[ (Special Original Jurisdiction) 3333 ] TUESDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 20867 OF 2015
Between:
SRI SAI MADHAVI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY AND OTHERS
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENT(S)
The Court made the following:
ORDER
Mr.Venkat Challa, learned counsel representing Mr.S.Sri Ram, learned counsel for the petitioners stated that thecause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has becomeinfructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition isdismissedas infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this WritPetitionshall
stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- M.PRABHAKARA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR '4: SECTION OFFICER
To,
ssb
HIGH COURT
DATED:05/03/2024
ORDER
WP.No.20867 of 2015
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
Sri Sai Madhavi Institute of Science and Technology, Mallampudi, Rajangaarama Mandal, East Godavari District
M.Anantha Satyanarayana Reddy
State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University-Kakinada, Rep. by its Registrar
The Convenor, (Admissions) APECET 2015
The Andhra Pradesh State Council for Higher Education, represented by its Secretary
V.Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
