Petitioner's writ petition challenging removal from service by newspaper was dismissed as abated because the petitioner was deceased and no legal heir filed the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST x' TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR S* PRESENT liW
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 41301 OF 2015
Between:
Sri M.R.C. Reddy, E 404619 Retd., Driver, S/o Narayana Reddy, Aged about 59 years, R/o D.No. 10/219(2), Teacher Colony, MydukurRoad, Proddatur, Kadapa Dist.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or directionmoreparticularly
^ V .V
one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4 th respondent removing the petitioner by his proceedings NO.E3/292(7)/2005PDTR, dated 01-03-2006, and modifying so far imposing punishment of rediicfiop of basis pay by two incremental stages for a period of two years which shall have the effect of postponing his future increments, the period Qf felnoval upto the date of reporting for duty be treated as Not on duty for \ the purpose of leave, wages, increments, and compelled to pay the fresh Security Deposit by the 3'^'^ respondent in his proceedings No.St/19(60)/2006-DVM(P) dated 03-06-2006 and conforming the same by the respondent in his proceedings No.PA/20B(31)/06-RM'C'dated25- 09-2006, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to lawassuch it is liable to be set aside, and consequently seeking direction to grant the continuity of service for all purposes and to release, the back wages for the interregnum period from the date of removal to till the reporting for duty.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2015fWPMP. NO: 53318 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date of hearing of this writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRI. S AKMYNUDDIN
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SCFOR " APSRTC KKAC)
The Court made the following: ORDER
i
APHC010098792015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
THURSDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 41301/2015
Between: Sri M.r.c. Reddy, E 404619 Retd., Driver ...PETITIONER
AND
\
The Apsrtc and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
...RESPONDENT(S)
1.S AKMYNUDDIN
Counsel for the Respondent{S):
1.
2. ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC)
3.
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
It is brought to the notice of this Court that learned counsel for the petitioner is no more. Notice was sent to the petitionerhereinandthesameis returned with an endorsement “addressee deceased”.
In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. There
shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this WritPetitionshallstand
closed.
. _ SD/- K.J. RAJA BABU assistant registrar
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
KKAC) Advocate [OPUC]
AVR
CRL SEC
14-09-2024
HIGH COURT
DATED:08/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.41301 of 2015
DISMISSING THE WP AS ABATED WITHOUT COSTS
M.R.C. Reddy
APSRTC and Others
V. SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
