Writ petition regarding G.O.Ms. No. 54 concerning leave treatment and salary payments was posted for default dismissal due to absence of petitioner representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
r
JfT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST' TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
-j
i
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 41866 OF 2015
Between:
i
w
1
p
Gahula Vari Peta, 0pp. BRMV Municipal High School, Palakot, West Godavari District.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularlyoneinthenatureof
writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondentsinissuing impugned G.O.Ms. No. 54, dated 20-08-2015 for treatingthe interim period from 02-06-2014 to 31-05-2015 as leave and extraordinary leave without counting the same as period on duty thereby deprivingthepetitionersthe valuable, hard earned leaves and E.O.Ls to their credit as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of ConstitutionofIndia.
LA. NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 53997 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to reconsider the issue upon considering the grievances already expressed by the petitioners throughtheirrepresentations dated 01-12-2015, 03-12-2015 and 11-12-2015 (via RPAD)submittedthrough proper channel of Respondents 5 and 6 wherein the Governmenthavedirected to treat the period from 02-06-2014 to 31-05-2015 asleaveandextraordinary leave and though the petitioners are entitled for fullsalaryafter31-05-2015 (i.e.) from 01-06-2015 the respondents have not paidsalaryforthemonthof June; July and until August 20th 2015, such action is illegal and arbitrary. Therefore it is further prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleasedtodirect the respondents to release the salary benefits of thepetitionersfortheperiod 01-06-2015 to 20-08-2015 pending disposal of the abovewritpetition.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 53996 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 1 to 3 to reconsider the issueuponconsideringthe grievances already expressed by the petitioners throughtheirrepresentations dated 01-12-2015, 03-12-2015 and 11-12-2015 (via RPAD)submittedthrough
proper channel of Respondents 5 and 6 pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s); SRI. SHAIK SHAKEEL AHMED
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION(AP)
Counsel for the Respondents: UMA SHANKAR LOKANADHAM(SCFOR APRSEI)
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION(AP)
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING(AP)
The Court made the following: ORDER
w
APHC010008892015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 41866/2015
Between;
Kondamudi Ananda Kumar, Guntur District & 10 Others and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
Chief Secy GAD Dept Hyderabad 5 Others and Others ...RESPONDENT{ S)
I
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Counsel for the Respondent(S);
1.GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP) 2.GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (AP) 3.UMA SHANKAR LOKANADHAM(SC FOR APRSEI) 4.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP)
The Court made the following:
«
ORDER :
When the matter was called on 31.07.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, and the matter was posted on 07.08.2024 under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
- Today when the matter is taken up, again there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not evincing any interest in the present case.
- Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To,
SECTION OFFICER
GSSK
«
HIGH COURT
DATED:07/08/2024
ORDER
0 6 FEB 2025
a e*
^ . Current Section . ^
WP.No.41866 of 2015
DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
Kondamudi Ananda Kumar & 10 Others
Chief Secy GAD Dept & 5 Others
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
