Dr. Ponnuru Muralikrishna, Guntur District v. Prl. Secretary, Medical, Health and Family Welfare, Hyd and 4 Ot
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI…
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 11458 OF 2014
Between:
Dr. Ponnuru Muralikrishna, S/o. Radhakrishna Murthy, Hindu, aged 50 years Civil Assistant Surgeon -cum- Superintendent, CommunityHealthCenter Ap’ Vaidya Vidhana Parishad Hospital, Macharla, Guntur District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ order or direction more one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 5'*" respondent in calling the petitioner to the police station without there being any case registered or pending before his office and without signing any reasons is illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 5th respondent not to harass the petitioner by calling to the police station under the threat of filing Criminal case without following due processoflaw.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 14436 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner by calling to the police station under the threat of filingCriminalcasewithout following due process of law pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. RAVIKUMAR MATHANGI
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR MED HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE DR. JXJSTICJIS K.MAJiMADHA RAO
WRJTJ>ETITIC)N No. U45a OF 2014
ORDER:
W]ien the matter was listed on 12.01.2024, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, so also earlier oc:casions. As such, this Court directed the matter to be listed for obtaining instructions on 23.01.2024.
Even today i.e on 23.01.2024, when the matter is called. there is no represem:.ation on beh.aif of the petitioner. It appears that, the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the writ petitio;n.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-
proseculion. No costs.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT RE9ISTRAR SECll^ OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:23/01/2024
ORDER
WP.No.11458 of 2014
I 13 JUN 202^1 i
^ ^ Current Section .
DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Dr. Ponnuru Muralikrishna
Government of Andhra Pradesh
The Director of Medical and Health, Koti
The District Medical and Health officer, Guntur
The District Collector, Guntur
The Station House Officer, Macherla P.S.
K. MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court