Writ petition by theatre operators seeking temporary C-Form permits under the A.P. Cinema (Regulations) Act was dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted that the cause no longer survived for adjudication. No costs were awarded and pending miscellaneous applications were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 23055 OF 2014
Between;
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may
\
be pleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4*^ respondent in not taking any action on the representation made by the Petitioners on 22.07.2014 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the 4*^ respondent to issue temporary permits in C-Form as per Clause a of Rule 13 (7) of A.P Cinema (Regulations) Act, 1970.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 28895 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4*'' respondent to issue temporary permits in C-Form as per Clause a of Rule 13 (7) of A.P Cinema (Regulations) Act, 1970, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI C. SUBODH
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
the; HON’BLE dr. justice K. MAWMADHA R^iO
WRIT PETITION No. :23QSS OP 2014
OjRDER:
Learned counsel for petitioners submitted that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive any further for adjudication and bec:ame infructuc 'US. In view of the said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as
infructuous. No order as to costs.
The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also
stand closed.
SD/- M PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECT^N OFFICER
To,
Cnr
MBT
HIGH COURT
DATED: 23/01/2024
ORDER
WP.No.23055of2014
%
"'ll’
!■< V'
%'0 <V,4'
€b 'y
'»5
3-
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Sri Vijaya Mahal, Mandepeta, East Godavari District
N. Rama Rao
Raja Ratna Theatre, Mandepeta, East Godavari District
Satyasree Theatre, Mandepeta, East Godavari District
Ambica Theatre, Mandepeta, East Godavari District
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
K. Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
