The High Court of Andhra Pradesh closed a writ petition challenging the erection of an electrical tower as infructuous because the petitioner's counsel did not receive further instructions.
The writ petition was closed as infructuous. There is no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
*^4
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AIVIARAVAJI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
-0<br>TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEM
>
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR oo Of
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAG
WRIT PETITION NO: 37441 OF 2013
Between:
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiaprayingthatinthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriatewritordirection declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuingnoticedated7-10-2013 for erection of electrical tower and also lines inthepetitionersfields in an extent of Ac 8-26 cents in D.No.6/ 1, Ponugupadu, Kandrika Village, Medikonduru Mandal, Guntur district as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principals of natural justice and consequently directthem not to erect the tower and electrical lines the petitioners land tillthepaymentofcompensation
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 46590 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings inpursuanceofnoticedated 7-10-2013 issued by the 2nd respondent for erectionofelectricallinesof400 KV from Vijayawada-Nellore section pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interests of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI. G V S MEHAR KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENERGY
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI T BALA MOHAN REDDY
The Court made the following ORDER:
APHC010557042013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI U
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3329]
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 37441/2013
Between:
Maddineni Suresh and Others
...PETITIONER{S)
AND
The Government Of A P and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.G VS MEHAR KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR ENERGY
2.T BALA MOHAN REDDY
The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri G. V.S.MeharKumar, submitted that he did not receive any learned counsel for the petitioner, instructions from the petitioner. Therefore, no furtherordersarenecessaryin this Writ Petition.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shallstandclosed. SD/- G HELA NAIDU assistant register //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
Mehar Kumar, Advocate [OPUC] 1. One CC to Sri G V S
JSS
WP-SS
'\
HIGH COURT
DATED:24/09/2024
ORDER
WP.No.37441 of 2013
5 15 MAR 2025 a Current Section
CLOSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
Maddineni Suresh and Others
The Government of A.P. and Others
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
