Contempt case alleging willful disobedience of orders dated 18.11.2022 in W.P.No.4906 of 2021. Petitioner's counsel submitted the respondents had complied pending the writ petition, so no further orders were needed; the Court recorded this and closed the contempt case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3329]
APHC010189352024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2239/2024
Between:
Pasula Madhava Reddy
...PETITIONER
AND
Vijay Kumari and Others
...CONTEMNOR(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.PILLI SUNDEEP
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2239/2024
ORDER
This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 18.11.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.4906 of 2021.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pending the Writ Petition, the respondents have complied with the orders dated 18.11.2022 passed by this Court in W.P.No.4906 of 2021, and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
23.09.2024 TPS
156
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
(closed)
Contempt Case No.2239 of 2024
23.09.2024 TPS
Pasula Madhava Reddy
Vijay Kumari and Others
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
