Writ petition listed for dismissal after repeated non-representation by the petitioner on three dates; the High Court dismissed it for default with no costs and closed miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3333]
APHC010774222015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 37023/2015
Between:
T. Haribabu,
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of A P Represented By The Commissioner Of ...RESPONDENT(S) and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.B PURUSHOTHAMA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
At the time when the matter was taken on 01.08.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was posted to 08.08.2024. Even on 08.08.2024, when the matter was called, there was no representation and the matter was posted to 22.08.2024, under the caption “For Dismissal”.
Though the matter was listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”, none appeared for the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in the present case.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for default. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________ V. SUJATHA, J
Date: 22.08.2024.
GSS
69
HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
W.P. No.37023 of 2015
Date:22.08.2024
GSS
T. Haribabu
The State of A P represented by the Commissioner and Others
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
