for the interview conducted by the District Selection Committee on 23.09.2015 at Tahsildar’s Office, Pulivendula. However, pending finalization of results of the interview conducted on 23.09.2015, the respondents have issued the impugned notification dated 06.10.2015. 6. On a perusal of the impugned notification, it is clear that the impugned notification is issued duly inviting applications for the same posts as was done in the earlier notification dated 13.06.2015. It is mentioned therein that the earlier notification was cancelled and it is mentioned that the candidates who have attended for the interviews in pursuance of the previous notification shall also apply. However, nowhere in the impugned notification, the respondents have specified the reason for cancelling the earlier notification dated 13.06.2015 and for not finalizing the selection process of those candidates who have attended the interview previously. 7. Learned Government Pleader, on instructions has reported that as of now the post of anganwadi helper of Thonduru III village IS vacant. Therefore, this Court prima facie is of the opinion that the respondents have failed to follow the due procedure in issuing the impugned notification dated 06.10.2015. As such, this Court feels it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the respondents to proceed further with the selection of the petitioner herein for the post of anganwadi helper in pursuance of the interview conducted on 23.09.2015, in accordance with law. The said process shall be completed within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
