The petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the selection process for the post of mini anganwadi workers. The court recorded the petitioner's request to withdraw the petition and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 34156 OF 2013
Between:
S. Lakshmamma, W/o. Krishna Naik, Aged about 25 Years D.No 4/2 Kondampalli (V), Rampuram (P), Penukonda(M), Anantapur (D), Andhra Pradesh.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other writororderordirection declaring the action of respondents in entertaining application contrary to the conditions of notification and further depriving the rights of the eligible candidates as arbitrary, unconstitutional and clear violation of the conditions of the notification and consequently direct the respondents to review the procedure of selection and proceed in accordancewithterms and conditions of notification.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2013fWPMP. NO: 42506 OF 2013t
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the selection process along with appointments pertaining to kondampalli village for the post of mini anganwadi workers/ayas pending disposal of the above writ petition.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WVMP. NO: 3082 OF 2Q17t
Between:
Smt. M.Navatha Bai, W/o. Hanumantha Naik, Aged about27Years Occ Anganwadi Worker, Cate : ST, R/o. D.No. 4/128, Kondampalli (V), Rampuram ( p), Penukonda (M), Anantapur (D), Andhra Pradesh.
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.5 in WP AND
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER in WP
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 28.11.2013 in W.P.M.P.No. 42506 of 2013 in W.P.No. 34156 of 2013 and dismiss the above Writ Petition in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SHEIKH NEHA HASSAN
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : GP FOR WOMEN DEVELOPMENT & CHILD WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent No.5 : SRI C. RAJA SEKHAR REDDY
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010453962013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3457] AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 34156/2013
Between:
...PETITIONER S Lakshmamma, Anantapur, A.P. AND The Govt Of A P Womenchild Hyd and ...RESPONDENT(S)
The Govt Of A P Womenchild Hyd and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: I.Ms.Sheikh Neha Hassan
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
I.Sri.C RAJASEKHAR REDDY
The Court made the following Order: Ms.Sheik Neha Hassan, learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted a letter seeking permission of this Courttowithdrawthe
present Writ Petition.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall standclosed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANJ REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
To,
IrAnd£a Pra°deJhJO°u'?f" ^ Child Welfare
Cnr
■H
HIGH COURT
DATED:21/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.34156 of 2013
o' 'Vj,
o;
(g 3 0 AU6 M2'( 0?fj
^ section ^
pat
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
V.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S. Lakshmamma
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Project Director, ICDS
Revenue Divisional Officer
Child Development Project Officer
M.Navatha Bai
HARINATH.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
