Writ petition dismissed for default after repeated non-representation by petitioners; pending miscellaneous applications closed, no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010053872021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 3325/2021
Between:
The Durga Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd., and Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
Bondili Krishna Mohan Krishna Singh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Earlier, when the matter has been listed on 08.05.2024 and 19.06.2024, there is no representation for the petitioners and the matter has been posted to today i.e., 21.06.2024 under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
Consequently miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in the Writ Petition, shall also stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE V. SUJATHA
Date: 21.06.2024 Pnr
The Durga Co-operative Urban Bank Ltd.
Bondili Krishna Mohan Krishna Singh
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
