Writ petition challenging non-consideration of recognition proposals and an order shifting teachers from the petitioner aided school was dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the cause did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 1808 OF 2021
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
Velagapudi, Guntur District
instance of the 4th Respondent Mandal Educational Officer as being arbitrary, illegal and violating Articles 14, 16 and21 of the Constitution of India and also in contravention of the Andhra PradeshEducationActand ■' ttie Rules framed there under and consequently setasidethesameand t-'' %!recfthe Respondents to consider‘the recognition proposalssubmittedby the Petitioner Institution on 27-09-2020 and issuesuchotherwritororderor direction as deemed fit and proper in the circumstancesofcase.
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd and 4th Respondent to forthwith process the renewal of recognition proposals Dated 27-09-2020 whichispendingbefore the 4th Respondent, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, in the interest of justice.
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings issued by the 3rdRespondentDistrict Educational Officer, Prakasham in his Rc. No. 6068/B5/2020, dated 09.12.2020, pending disposal of the Writ Petition,intheinterestofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIVA SANKARA RAO BORRA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010025412021
[3333]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 1808/2021
Between:
Indira Gandhi Oriental Aided Elementary School ...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SIVA SANKARA RAO BORRA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR EDUCATION
The Court made the following:
4 ^
I /
ORDER
Mr.B.Siva Sankara Rao, learned counsel representing Mr.M.Sri Vijay, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand
closed.
SD/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTYiREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC OFFICER
To,
VS
<
HIGH COURT
DATED:21/06/2024
ORDER
WP.No.1808 of 2021
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Indira Gandhi Oriental Aided Elementary School, Donakonda Mandal, Prakasam District, rep by its Correspondent Kola Paul Brested
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Principal Secretary to Government School Education Department
The Commissioner of School Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh
The District Educational Officer, Ongole
The Mandal Educational Officer, Donakonda Mandal, Prakasam District
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
