The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous without costs, holding that the cause of action pertained to the academic year 2011-12, rendering the petition stale for 2024 adjudication.
The Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
--0
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAU^ANO (Special Original Jurisdiction) ? 3 FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY |0 TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
-ov
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 29949 OF 2011
Between:
M. Rajani, D/o Madhusudhan Reddy, aged about 31 years.Student,R/o2-2- 321, Amberpet, Hyderabad.
...Petitioner
AND
...Respondents Court Order Dated.02.12.2011 in WPMP (R2 C.T is amended as per No.37692of 2011)
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiaprayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,theHighCourtmay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction moreparticularlyoneinthe NATURE OF MANDAMUS declaring the fixation of pass marksinM.Ed. Course by respondent University at 40% paper wise, despitesatisfying 50% of marks on aggregate, is arbitrary, unreasonable, irrational and Article 14 of the Constitution of India and discriminatory, violating consequently to declare the petitioner as having passedtheM.Ed.Course during academic year 2010-2011
I A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 37117 OF 2011)
praying that in the Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the circumstances stated in High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to declare the petitioner as having passed the M.Ed. Course during academic year 20102011 by fixing the pass mark in M.Ed. Course at 50%onaggregateinstead of 40% paper wise
Counsel for the Petitioner
;M/s YASHOKRAJ
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI C SUDESH ANAND, StandingCounsel Counsel for the Respondents: SMT A.V.S.LAXMI The Court made the following: ORDER
}
( f
<br>
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO; 29949 OF 2011
Between:
- M. Rajani,, D/o Madhusudhan Reddy, Student, R/o 2-2-321, Amberpet, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
V 1 3
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the NATURE OF MANDAMUS declaring the fixation of passmarks in M.Ed. Course by respondent University at 40% paper wise, despite satisfying 50% of marks on aggregate, is arbitrary, unreasonable, irrational and discriminatory, violating Article 14oftheConstitution of India and consequently to declare the petitioner as having passed the M.Ed. Course during academic year 2010-2011 and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. Y ASHOK RAJ
Counsel for the Respondents: 2682/C SUDESH ANAND
Counsel for the Respondents:
Counsel for the Respondents: A V S LAXMI
The Court made the following:
/- /
When the matter is taken up today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
- Since the issue pertains to the year 2011, seekingadirectionto the respondents, to declare the petitioner as having passed the M.Ed. Course during the academic year 2010-2011, this court is of the opinion that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication.
- Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition
shall stand closed.
/
To,
Sd/- K.J. RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// fitSECTION OFFICER
PSR
/
HIGH COURT
DATED:16/02/2024
ORDER
WP.No.29949 of 2011
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Writ Petition seeking declaration of passing in an M.Ed. course survives the plaintiff's request for adjudication in 2024.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Rajani
The Vice Chancellor, Krishna University
The Registrar, Krishna University
The Controller of Examinations, Krishna University
V. Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
