Writ petition sought quashing of Cr.No.278 of 2015 insofar as it arrayed the petitioner as accused. Respondents reported the case was numbered C.C.No.306 of 2015 and was compromised before Lok Adalath on 28.07.2022. The Court held nothing survived for adjudication and closed the writ petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-’
<br>
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 28687 OF 2015 ^
Between:
A. Setish Goud, S/o Lova Raju, Hindu, ^ged about 43 years, Occ: Advocate, r/o D.NQ. 4-87, Maduranagar, Kakinada East Godavari' District.
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 2^ of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ,orderordirectionmore particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in arraying the petitioner asanaccused in Cr.NO. v/ 278 of 2015 on the file SHO Sarpavaram P.S. KakinadaE.G. District and declare the same as illegal arbitrary unjust and consequently quash the case in Cr.No. 27^'of 2015 in so far as the petitioner is concerned and to pass such other orders as are necessary in the interests of justice.
M:
LA. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 37173 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all proceedingsinCr.No.278of 2015 on the file of the SHO, ^rpavaram P.S.Kakinada, E.G. District in so far as the petitioner is concerned.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. G L NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME {ApK Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
\
APHC0I00I29520IS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THQUSANO AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 28687 OF 2015
Between:
A. Satish Goud, S/o Lova Raju ...PETITIONER{S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S)
...PETITIONER{S)
Counsel for the Petitioner{s):SRI. G L NAGESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
V
The present Writ Petition is filed under the Article226oftheConstitution of India for the following relief:
"...to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring theaction of the ^rd respondent in arraying the petitioner as an accused in Cr.NQ. 278 of 2015 on the file SHO 5arpavaram P.S. Kakinada E.G. District and declare the same as illegal arbitrary unjust and consequently quash the case inQr.No. 278 of 2015 in so far as the petitioner is concernedandto pa^ssuch other orders..."
,2. Heard Mr.Yeswanth.K, learned counsel, representinglearnedcounselfor the petitioner and learned Assistant Government PleaderforHomeforofficial
,2.
respondents.
- Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home subniitted a copy of written instructions received from Sub Inspector of Police, Sarpavaram Police
-^3
Station, Kakinada District, stating that the case in Cr.No.278 of 2015 was registered and the same was numbered as C.C.No.306 of 2015. The said case was compromised before the LokAdalath on 28.07.2022. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for respondents and upon perusing the written instructions filed by respondent Police, this Court is of the opinion that, nothing survives in the present Writ Petition for further adjudication. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-NI.PRABHAKARA RAO assistant REGISTRAR I^SEOTTON OFFICER
To,
V
csb
HIGH COURT
DATE 0:26/02/2024
ORDER
AWO
o\
g 0 3 AUG 20?'| Coml'
. Current Section
WP.No.28687 of 2015
CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the petitioner's arraignment in Cr.No.278 of 2015 survives after the underlying case was compromised before Lok Adalath.
A. Satish Goud
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary Home Department
The Superintendent of Police East Godavari District, Kakinada
The Station House Officer, Sarpavaram P.S. Kakinada, E.G. District
Nunna Naiyana Rao
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
