Disposed

E. Devanjaneyulu v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC22 Feb 2024WP/29769/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought directions to act on a 2014 SC/ST Act crime. Counsel jointly submitted that after investigation a charge sheet was filed as C.C. No. 36 of 2015 and the trial ended in acquittal on 19.06.2017, so nothing survived. Recording the submissions, the court closed the writ petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition closed; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications also closed.

E. Devanjaneyulu Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh — Caste Atrocities | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAWWO (Special Original Jurisdiction) O FRIDAY .THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY • TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 29769 OF 2014

¶6

Between:

¶7

E. Devanjaneyulu, S/o Late P. Anjaneyulu aged about 48 years, R/o Door No. 4/734, 5th Road Mahabooba Towers, Plot No. 404, Anantapuram Post and Mandal Anantapur District

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶11

The Superintendent of Police Anantapuram,, Anantapuram^District

¶12

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram, Anantapuram District

¶13

The Inspector of Police, I Town, Anantapuram, Anantapur^Dist.

¶14

K. Pulla Reddy,, S/o not known, aged 46 years District^{PresidentofPrivate} Schools Anantapuram. Anantapuram District

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more particularly^{oneinthenatureofWrit} of Mandamus to declare that the action of the Respondents 1 to 4 in not taking further action in crime No. 328 of 2014 U/s 3 (1) (x) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 though the complaint filed by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential^direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 4 to take further action in Crime no. 328 of 2014 U/S 3 (1) (x) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 and pass

¶17

LA. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 37190 OF 2014)

¶18

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstatedin} the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to take action in^{CrimeNo.328of2014U/S3} (1) (x) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 before I Town Police Station, Anantapuram, Anantapur District pending disposal of W.P.

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. G ALLABAKASH Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER

<5^ \

a r-'

APHC0I0034192014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶24

[3310] FRIDAY THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶25

PRESENT

¶26

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶27

WRIT PETITION NO: 29769 OF 2014

¶28

Between:

¶29

Late p. Anjaneyulu aged about 48 years, R/o Door No.

¶30

M^ndal Anantepur d“ ^nantapuram Post and

¶31

...PETITIONER{S)

¶32

AND

¶33

The GoverniTient of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary Home Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶34

The Superintendent of Police Anantapuram, Anantapuram^District

¶35

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Anantapuram, Anantapuram District 4. The Inspector of Police, I Town, Anantapuram, Anantapur^Dist.

¶36

K. Pulla Reddy, S/o not known, aged 46 years District President of Private Schools Anantapuram. Anantapuram District

¶37

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare that the action of the Respondents 1 to 4 in not 4 00^® of 2014 U/s 3 (1) (X) of SC/ST (POA) Act, f complairit filed by the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary^andviolation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential direction to the respondent Nos.1 to 4 to take further action in Crime no. 328 of 2014 U/S 3 (1) (x) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 and pass

¶38

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 37190 OF 2014)

¶39

■ *u under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances^stated ' m the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to take action in Crime No. 328 of 2014 U/S 3 ( ) (x) of SC/ST (POA) Act, 1989 before I Town Police Station, Anantapuram Anantapur District pending disposal of W.P. and pass

¶40

Counsel for the Petitioner(s):SRI. G ALLABAKASH

¶41

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP)

¶42

The Court made the following:

¶43

ORDER

¶44

Heard Mr. G. Allabaksh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents^1to4.

¶45

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents 1 to 4 placed on record the written instructions of 4*'^ respondent^{andsubmittedthatacase} in Crime No.328 of 2014 has been registered on the complaint of the petitioner against the respondent. After investigation, Charge^{Sheethasbeenfiledvide} C.C.No.36 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Special Court for SC, STs, Ananthapuramu and the case is ended as acquittal on 19.06.2017. Therefore the cause in this writ petition does not survive and requested^{toclosethesame.}

¶46

Recording the submissions of both the counsel, this^{WritPetitionisclosed.} There shall be no order as to costs.

¶47

The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall^{alsostandclosed.}

¶48

To,

¶49

Sd/- G.HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC^&^FICER

¶50

One CC to SRI. G ALLABAKASH, Advocate [OPUC]

¶51

Two CCs to GP FOR HOME, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

¶52

Three CD Copies

•>4

HIGH COURT

DRKMRJ

DATED:23/02/2024

V**'
>5;
o
o t3'
m
§ 2 3 JUL 232'^ cr.
S' Current Section
☆

¶58

ORDER

¶59

WP.No.29769 of 2014

¶60

CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

E. Devanjaneyulu v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

E. Devanjaneyulu v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ulabala Rama Lakshmi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary

Narala Bal Reddy , Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Bommasani Mutyala Rao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by Pri Secretary

Korada Ravi Prasad, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Munipally Panduranga Vital Prasad S/o. Vijaya Rajendra Babu, Vs The Government of a P.

Katta Chakravarhty Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh"