Disposed

M Haritha v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC12 Nov 2024WP/2839/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition concerning appointment as Trained Graduate Teacher in Zone-IV. Counsel submitted that during pendency the petitioner was appointed as TGT and no further orders were needed. Recording the submission, the court closed the writ petition with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

None granted; writ petition closed after petitioner was appointed as TGT pending disposal.

M Haritha Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Education and Admissions | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

Between:

¶4

M. Haritha, W/o. P. Shankarnath, aged about 31 years, R/o. 48/103-C, Budhwarpet, Behind Montessorie High School, Kurnool - 518 001, Kurnool District ...PETITIONER AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Secondary Education, Secretariat buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi,^Guntur District.

¶5

...PETITIONER

¶6

A.P. Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society! rep. by its Secretary Amaravathi, Guntur District. ‘

¶7

The National Council for Teachers Education, rep. by its Member Secretary G-7, Sector-10, Dwarka,Near Metro Station,^{Delhi-110075.}

¶8

M Sowjanya Devi, D/o. M. Deva Das, Kurnool Road, Kurnool, Kurnoor District.v..'

¶9

...RESPONDENTS

¶10

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the^action of the 2nd respondent in deleting the name of the petitioner in the Selection List dt.22.01.202^ though her name is placed in Merit List^{dt.11.10.2019and} also the provisional selection list dt.29.12.2019 for the post of Trained

¶11

Graduate Teacher (TGT) in Zone-IV and also the action of^Jhe 2nd £ respondent in not considering the representations dt.23.01.2020 and 03.02.2620 and keeping them in the cold storage is^{illegal,arbitraryand} unconstitutional and consequently direct the 2nd respondent^toappointthe petitioner as Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) in Zone-IV^{bysettingaside} the provisional selection list so far as the post of^Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) in Zone-IV, in SC Women category of 2nd^Respondent institution.

¶12

lA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶13

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondents to keep^{onepostofTrained} Graduate Teacher (TGT) in Zone-IV vacant in SC Women category, pending disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶14

Counsel for the PetitloneriSRI Y V ANIL KUMAR

¶15

Counsel for the Respondent N0.I: GP FOR EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondent No.2: M/s ANITHA MESA (^SCFORAPREIS TW SW BC)

¶16

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI P POONA RAOJ^ENTRAL GOVERNMENT)

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: -

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

¶20

APHC010048732020

¶21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶22

[3310]

¶23

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶24

WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶25

PRESENT

¶26

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

¶27

WRIT PETITION NO: 2839/2020

Between:

M Haritha

...PETITIONER

AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others

¶33

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶34

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶35

1.Y VANIL KUMAR

¶36

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶37

1.GP FOR EDUCATION (AP)

¶38

2.ANITHA MESA (SC FOR APREIS TW SW BC)

¶39

The Court made the following:

¶40

ORDER

¶41

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr Y.V.Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the Writ Petition the case of the petitioner was considered and she was appointed as Trained Graduate Teacher(TGT). Hence, no orders are required to be passed in this Writ Petition and it may be closed.

¶42

Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is^closed.No

¶43

order as to costs.

¶44

As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands

¶45

closed.

¶46

//TRUE COPY//

¶47

Sd/- M PRABHAKAR RAO assistant registrar SECTtoN OFFICER

¶48

To,

¶49

OneCCto SRI. Y. V. ANIL KUMAR. Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR EDUCATION, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

¶50

[OUT]

¶51

One CC to M/s.ANITHA MESA, (SC FOR APREIS TW SW BC) Advocate [OPUC]

¶52

One CC to SRI. P. POONA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]

¶53

Three C.D.Copies

HIGH COURT

DATED:13/11/2024

ORDER

WP.No.2839 of 2020

I D 9 MAY 2C25 «m

CLOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS

M Haritha v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M Haritha v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uggina Bulli Babu, S/o. Late Chittodu (Died) Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

P. Samba Siva Rao Vs The Executive OFficer

K. Jagadeeswari & 5 Ors. Vs Prl. Secy., Rev. Dept.& 2 Ors.

Domathoti Radhakrishna Venkata Lakshmi Devi, Vs The District Collector and District Magistrate

D. Sundar Rami Reddy, Spsr Nellore Dist. Vs the State of a.P.,Mines,Hyd., & Anr.

Smt. Pulivarthi Padmavathi, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh