The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed in 2007 for non-prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear or file a representation for over 17 years, leading the Court to conclude there was no interest to prosecute the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 28030 OF 2007
Between:
Pakalapati Satyanarayana Varma, S/o Sitarama Raju,aged59years, R/o Tuni, East Godavari District. ...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiaprayingthatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,theHighCourtmay be pleased to issue writ, order or direction, moreparticularlyone in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action oftherespondents 1 to 3
in not considering the representation dated 01.12.2007submittedbythe petitioner to stop the proposed alienations of the properties of Datia Perumalla Raju Trust, Laxminarasapuram, Anaparthy Mandal, East Godavari District by the respondents 4 & 5 as illegalandarbitraryand consequently direct the respondents 1 to 3 to enquireintothematterand stopthe proposed alienations by any individual of thesaidtrustproperty.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2007fWPMP. NO: 36653 OF 2007)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the representation dated 01-12-2007 submitted by the petitionerandenquire the same and pass appropriate orders on such representationpending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the PetitionenSRI KVA RAMA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents No.1,2: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI V T M PRASADSCFOR
ENDOWNMENTS
Counsel for the Respondents No.4,5 : - The Court made the following: ORDER
y
APHC010191312007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
TUESDAY ,THE TWELFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 28030/2007
Between:
...PETITIONER Pakalapati Satyanarayana Varma
AND ^ The Deputy Commissioner Of Endowments Dept and \ Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
...RESPONDENT(S)
1.KV A RAMA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.V T M PRASAD SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS 2.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
As can be seen from the proceedings sheet, on 30.01.2018therewas no representation for the petitioner and the matter isadjourned.Today,when the matter is taken up, none appears for the petitioner.
✓
2
To,
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- SHAIK MOHD. RAFI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER /
\
HIGH COURT DATED: 12/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.28030 of 2007
? 16 APR 2025 g
^ . Current Section
DISMISING THE WP FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Pakalapati Satyanarayana Varma
The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments Dept, Government of A.P., Kakinada
The Asst. Commissioner of Endowments Dept, Government of A.P., Rajahmundry
Executive Officer, Datia Parmalla Raju Trust
Detia Padmavathi Devi
Detia Chiranjeevi Raju
K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
