The Writ Petition seeking quashing of an order by the Central Administrative Tribunal was dismissed by the High Court of Andhra Pradesh for want of prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
AND
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 27232 OF 2006
Between:
K.A.S. Pillai s/o. Sri K. Arunachala Pillai, Aged about 62 years, Retired Asst. Engineer (Civil), Office of the Executive Engineer,TelecomCivil Division, Tirupathi, R/o 20.01.200A, Maruthi Nagar, Kurlagunta, Tirupathi 517501
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
s
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ,orderordirectionmore particularly a writ in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records relating to and connected with the order dated 12-6-2006 passed by the Hon'ble K- ^^htral Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, Hyderabad in OA No. ft’ I ^6/2002 and quash the same by allowing the OA as prayedfor. ’T., *
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2006fWPMP. NO: 34990 QF 2QQ61
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the above WP by fixing an early date of hearing.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s)
SRI S ASHOK ANAND KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : Counsel for the Respondent No.1 :
SRI P YASASWY
SRI B NARASIMHA SARMA
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SATYANARAYANA KAMLA
SRI BOKKA
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010160012006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
[3470]
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 27232/2006
, J
Between:
Kas. Pillai, Tiurpati.
...PETITIONER
AND
Telecom New Delhi 2 Others and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.S ASHOK ANAND KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2.B NARASIMHA SARMA
The Court made the following:
ORDER: (per Ravi Nath Tilhari, J)
No representation for the petitioner.
- Learned Standing counsel for Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited(BSNL)
for the respondents is present.
- The matter pertains to the year 2006 and has been listedunderthe
caption ‘specially identified cases’.
prosecution”.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also
stand closed.
SD/- B CHITTI JOSEPH assistant registrar
//TRUE COPY//
OFFICER SEC
To
ANAND KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 1. One CC to SRI S ASHOK
P YASASWY Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI
NARASIMHA SARMA Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI B
BOKKA SATYANARAYANA KAMLA, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI
JS
i
HIGH COURT
DATED:11/07/2024
ORDER
WP.No.27232 of 2006
?5»amoh
X 2 0 JAN 2025 S
^ Curreni Section
DISMISSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS
K.A.S. Pillai
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
Ravi Nath Tilhari
Nyapathy Vijay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
