This warrant judgment dismisses Writ Petition No. 27062 of 2014 for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on the listed date, implying disinterest in continuing the suit regarding a shop shift direction.
Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous petitions stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
— »
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI ,
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 27062 OF 2014
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring that the notice of the first respondent dated 02,09.2014 directing the petitioner to shift the retail wine shop from the licensed premises namely, D.No.41-1-130, Feeder Road, Krishna Lanka, Vijayawada, Krishna District to another suitable premises, is arbitrary, illegal and ultra virus the Rules and direct the respondents not to interfere with the right of the petitioner to conduct the retail wine shop at the licensed premises without
3
on change of premises and grant such other relief as itdeemsfitin the circumstances of the case.
I.A. NO: 3 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 33836 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to direct the respondents not to insist onthepetitionertoshiftthe retail wine shop of the petitioner from premises No.41-1-130,FeederRoad, Krishna Lanka, Vijayawada, Krishna District (licensed premises) to any other suitable premises, pending disposal of the writpetitionandgrantsuch other relief as it deems fit in the circumstances ofthecase,todirectthe4th respondent to provide requisite police protection tothepetitionerforrunning the retail wine shop at the licensed premises i.e.premisesNo.41-1-130, Feeder Road, Krishna Lanka, Vijayawada, Krishna District (licensed premises), pending disposal of the writ petition andgrantsuchotherreliefas it deems fit in the circumstances of the case.
LA. NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 33835 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition,theHighCourtmaybe pleased to direct the 4th respondent to provide requisitepoliceprotectionto the petitioner for running the retail wine shop atthelicensedpremisesi.e. premises No.41-1-130, Feeder Road, Krishna Lanka, Vijayawada,Krishna District (licensed premises), pending disposal of thewritpetitionandgrant such other relief as it deems fit in the circumstancesofthecase.
LA. NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP. NO: 3164 OF 2014)
Between:
... Petitioners/Respondents
AND
... Respondent/Petitioner
...Respondent/Respondent No.4
(R2 is a formal party in this Petition)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim order Dt.12.09.2014 passedW.P.M.P.No.33836 of 2014 in W.P.No.27062 of 2014 and dismiss of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M/S BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES (Not Present)
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE (AP)
The Court made the following: Order
\
\
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AMARAVATI
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.27062 OF 2014
Between:
Yandrathi Shiva Kumari, W/o Srinivasa Rao, Aged about 45 years, M/s Keerthi Wines, D.No.41-1-130, Feeder Road, Krishna Lanka, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
... Petitioner
And
/ ^
The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Vijayawada, Krishna District and three others.
... Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner ; M/s Bharadwaj Associates Counsel for respondents : GP for Prohibition & Excise
ORDER
As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioneron 18.06.2024, the matter was directed to be listed on this day under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
Even today also there is no representation on behalfofthe petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
Page 2 of 3
SRSJ W.P.No.27062 of 2014
Therefore, Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No
costs.
As a sequel, pending misceilaneous petitions, if any, shall
Stand closed.
To,
^ Sd/-BPRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTI OFFICER
T One CC to SRI M/S BHARADWAJ ASSOCIATES Advocate [OPUC] prohibition Andhra Pradesh [OUT] ^ & EXCISE (AP), High Court of
A,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 19/06/2024
ORDER
WP.No.27062 of 2014
anoS^
l(x 2 8 JAN 2C2j
\o
Current Section
,2£spatcv'^^
WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED WITHOUT COSTS
Yandrathi Shiva Kumari
The Prohibition and Excise Superintendent, Vijayawada
The Deputy Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Vijayawada
The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Hyderabad
The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada
SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
