The Hon'ble Justice Harinath.N dismissed Writ Petition No. 25008 of 2004 filed by G. Srinivasa Raju against the Regional Manager, APSRTC, as infructuous upon the counsel's submission that the cause no longer survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 25008 OF 2004 ^
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the proceedings of the respondent issued in No.Supt(876(13) 03RM ’G’ dt 25-11-2004 as illegal and arbitrary and consequentlysetasidethe above proceedings and further direct the respondent to absorb the petitioner as conductor into the services of the corporation.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP. NO: 32702 OF 2004^
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Fix an early date for hearing of the WP.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. G L NAGESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: SOLOMON RAJU MANCHALA FOR (APSRTC) Counsel for the Respondents: R MANMADHA REDDY
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010551982004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI ' ' (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3457]
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
C
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 25008/2004
BETWEEN:
G.SRINIVASA RAJU
...PETITIONER
AND
THE REGIONAL MANAGER
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.G L NAGESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent: 1.R MANMADHA REDDY 2.SOLOMON RAJU MANCHALAFOR (APSRTC)
The Court made the following Order:
Sri G.L. Nageswar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive any further.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition isdismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
2
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall
stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- K L PAVANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
To,
VSNL
ACCTS
HIGH COURT DATED:22/08/2024
ORDER
WP.No.25008 of 2004
CT
17 MAR 2025
>v ^ Current Section
DISMISSING THE WP
WITHOUT COSTS
G. Srinivasa Raju
The Regional Manager, APSRTC
Harinath.N
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
