Writ petition dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the cause does not survive; no costs, miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APHC010097432017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 24790/2017
Between:
Smt. Kutla Uma
...PETITIONER
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj and 5 others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.AKKAM ESHWAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP)
The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
Date: 06.12.2024 KGR
Smt. Kutla Uma
The State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Panchayat Raj
V.Sujatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
