Writ petition dismissed for default as the petitioner failed to appear or show interest on successive dates; pending miscellaneous applications also closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APHC010535552016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3333]
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 10978/2016
Between:
The Depot Secretary,
...PETITIONER
AND
The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation ...RESPONDENT(S) and Others
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.A NAGENDRA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2.ARAVALA RAMA RAO(SC FOR APSRTC KKAC)
The Court made the following:
2
ORDER :
Earlier, when the matter was taken on 27.11.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was posted to 04.12.2024, under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
Consequently miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in the Writ
Petition, shall also stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
Date: 06.12.2024 KGR
The Depot Secretary
The Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation
V.SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
