Writ petition alleging daily police-station harassment in a civil dispute was dismissed as infructuous after counsel stated the cause no longer survives; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
oi
j ul JrJ >
P"'‘
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 24524 OF 2014
Between:
Eragam Srinivasula Reddy, S/o Late Eragam Peddangi Reddy, Resident of D.No.20/719-1, Co-Operative Colony, KadapaTown, Kadapa.
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4'^ respondent calling the petitioners from 21-8-2014 onwards every day to the police station and making them to sit hours together by harassing in the subject matter of Civil nature as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional and
violative of Article 14, 19 (i), (g), 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently to direct the 4th respondent not to call the petitioner to the 4 th respondent Police Station and making them to sit hours together by harassing in the subject matter of Civil nature.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2014fWPMP. NO: 30726 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4*^ respondent not to call the petitioner to the 4^^ respondent Police Station and making them to sit hours together by harassing in the subject matter of Civil Nature, pending disposal of the Writ Petition before this Hon'ble Court.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI Y. VENKATASATYAM Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos.5 & 6: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
W.P.No.24524 of 2014
ORDER:-
Sri Narendra Babu, learned counsel representing Sri Y.Venkata Satyam, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared virtually and submitted that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive, and it has become infructuous.
- Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the official respondents is present.
- Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as Infructuous.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if
any, shall stand closed.
SD/- K. J. RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
[OPUC]
Pradesh. [OUT]
ssb MBT
»
HIGH COURT
DATED: 22/01/2024
ORDER
WP.No.24524of 2014
-Of
Vs,
Oi,
18 JUN 20211 ml;
•ir'-:'
Current Section
i'
S’Vspya^jC^^^i
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Eragam Srinivasula Reddy
The Govt. of A.P., rep. by its Secretary, Home Department
The Superintendent of Police, Kadapa District
The Circle Inspector of Police, I Town Police Station, Kadapa
The Station House Officer, I Town Police Kadapa
Mekala Bhaskara Reddy
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
