Writ petition dismissed as infructuous after counsel submitted the cause did not survive; no costs, pending interlocutory applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APHC010030852021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
THURSDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 2146/2021
Between:
Puvvala Parvathi
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.G RAMACHANDRA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR WOMEN DEV CHILD WELFARE
The Court made the following:
ORDER :
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.M.Venkata Siva Teja, learned counsel, representing Mr.G.Ramachandra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
2
infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.
_________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
Date: 19.12.2024
ARR
3
HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
Writ Petition No.2146 of 2021
Date: 19.12.2024
ARR
Puvvala Parvathi
The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others
K Manmadha Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
