The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the Writ Petition as infructuous based on counsel's submission that the cause no longer survives. No substantive legal issue was adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
APHC010029212021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3310]
THURSDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 2039/2021
Between:
K Siva Prasada Rao
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.GUNDRATI RAMAN GOUD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
ORDER :
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr.Bala Ramesh, learned counsel, representing Mr.Gundrati Raman Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.
2
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.
_________________________ DR. K. MANMADHA RAO, J.
Date: 19.12.2024
ARR
3
HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
Writ Petition No.2039 of 2021
Date: 19.12.2024
ARR
K Siva Prasada Rao
The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others
K MANMADHA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
